Combination immunotherapy compositions against cancer and methods

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are immunotherapeutic compositions and the concurrent use of combinations of such compositions for the improved induction of therapeutic immune responses and/or for the prevention, amelioration and/or treatment of disease, including, but not limited to, cancer and infectious disease.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/264,846, filed Jan. 12, 2012 which is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/031460, filed Apr. 16, 2010, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/170,530, filed Apr. 17, 2009, the entire disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was created in the performance of a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with the National Institutes of Health, an Agency of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Government of the United States has certain rights in this invention.

STATEMENT REGARDING JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

This invention was made by or on behalf of parties to a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, executed May 8, 2008. The parties to the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement are: GlobeImmune, Inc. and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as represented by National Cancer Institute, an Institute, Center or Division of the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING

This application contains a Sequence Listing submitted electronically as a text file by EFS-Web. The text file, named “3923-24-PCT_ST25”, has a size in bytes of 47 KB, and was recorded on 16 Apr. 2010. The information contained in the text file is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.52(e)(5).

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the concurrent use of two different immunotherapeutic compositions for the improved induction of therapeutic immune responses and/or for the prevention, amelioration and/or treatment of disease, including, but not limited to, cancer and infectious disease.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Immunotherapeutic compositions, including vaccines, are one of the most cost-effective measures available to the health care industry for the prevention and treatment of disease. There remains, however, an urgent need to develop safe and effective immunotherapy strategies and adjuvants for a variety of diseases, including those caused by or associated with infection by pathogenic agents, cancers, genetic defects and other disorders of the immune system. For the treatment of cancer and many infectious diseases, including viral diseases and diseases caused by intracellular pathogens, it is desirable to provide immunotherapy that elicits a cell-mediated (cellular) immune response, although many vaccines are directed primarily or entirely to elicitation of humoral immunity. Indeed, a disadvantage of many subunit vaccines, as well as many killed or attenuated pathogen vaccines, is that while they appear to stimulate a strong humoral immune response, they fail to elicit protective cell-mediated immunity.

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, and the development of effective therapies for cancer continues to be one of the most active areas of research. Although a variety of innovative approaches to treat and prevent cancers have been proposed, many cancers continue to have a high rate of mortality and may be difficult to treat or relatively unresponsive to conventional therapies. Novel discoveries in cancer biology have provided the opportunity to design target-specific anti-cancer agents and have fostered advances in drug and immunotherapy development. These discoveries make it possible to design molecules and therapeutic compositions with high selectivity against specific targets in cancer cells.

Numerous immunotherapy studies have been reported comparing vaccine platforms that target the same antigen, in terms of their ability to induce immune cell activity and antitumor effects (e.g., see Weide et al., Immunol Lett 2008 Jan. 15; 115(1):33-42; Riezebos-Brilman et al., Gene Ther 2007 December; 14(24):1695-704; Naslund et al., J Immunol 2007 Jun. 1; 178(11):6761-9; Mylin et al., J Virol 2000 August; 74(15):6922-34; Millar et al., Cell Immunol 2007 November-December; 250(1-2):55-67; Hodge et al., Cancer Res 2003 Nov. 15; 63(22):7942-9; Chan et al., Gene Ther 2006 October; 13(19):1391-402; Casimiro et al., J Virol 2003 June; 77(10:6305-13; and Bos et al., J Immunol 2007 Nov. 1; 179(9):6115-22). Millar et al. showed that the functionality of T-cell populations induced by two different vectors (rV and recombinant adenovirus) targeting the same antigen did not differ (Millar et al., Cell Immunol 2007 November-December; 250(1-2):55-67).

The antitumor efficacy of the diversified prime and boost vaccine regimen of recombinant vaccinia (rV) and recombinant fowlpox (rF) viruses containing murine B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 genes as well as the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene (rV/F-CEA/TRICOM) has previously been reported in preclinical models (Hodge et al., Cancer Res 2003 Nov. 15; 63(22):7942-9; Hodge et al., Cancer Res 1999 Nov. 15; 59(22):5800-7; Hodge et al., Clin Cancer Res 2003 May; 9(5):1837-49; Grosenbach et al., Cancer Res 2001 Jun. 1; 61(11):4497-505; Greiner et al., Cancer Res 2002 Dec. 1; 62(23):6944-51; Arlen et al., Crit Rev Immunol 2007; 27(5):451-62). Recently, the antitumor effects of a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast-CEA) vaccine were also documented in preclinical models (Bernstein et al., Vaccine 2008 Jan. 24; 26(4):509-21; Wansley et al., Clin Cancer Res 2008 Jul. 1; 14(13):4316-25). The induction of immune response after vaccination with either rV/FCEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA has been documented, and the antitumor effects elicited by either vaccine are mainly attributed to the induction of CEA-specific T-cell populations.

Several studies have documented that the induction of a more diverse T-cell population is advantageous in mounting an immune response in various models of disease, including cancer (Dudley et al., Cancer J 2000 March-April; 6(2):69-77; Dutoit et al., Cancer Res 2001 Aug. 1; 61(15):5850-6; Echchakir et al., Int Immunol 2000 April; 12(4):537-46; Ferradini et al., Cancer Res 1992 Sep. 1; 52(17):4649-54; Messaoudi et al., Science 2002 Nov. 29; 298(5599):1797-800; Nikolich-Zugich et al., Nat Rev Immunol 2004 February; 4(2):123-32; Sportes et al., J Exp Med 2008 Jul. 7; 205(7):1701-14; Zhou et al., Cancer Res 2005 Feb. 1; 65(3):1079-88). However, there are no reports of concurrent use of vaccines that target the same antigen. Following studies targeting the same antigen, such as those described above, investigators historically either choose the most efficacious vaccine for further study, or employ a diversified prime and boost strategy to amplify the T-cell response. For example, a diversified prime-boost vaccination strategy with recombinant vaccinia and fowlpox vectors targeting CEA (Hodge et al., Vaccine 1997 April-May; 15(6-7):759-68; Marshall et al., J Clin Oncol 2000 Dec. 1; 18(23):3964-73), was employed because the immune response to the first vaccine has been shown to reduce the effects of subsequent vaccinations with the same vector (Naslund et al., 2007, supra; Grosenbach et al., 2001, supra, Hodge et al., 1997, supra, and Wu et al., J Virol 2005 July; 79(13):8024-31). Similar results demonstrating the clear advantages of a diversified prime-boost strategy have been described in a variety of cancer and other disease models, including HIV and malaria (Wu et al, 2005, supra; Pancholi et al., J Infect Dis 2000 July; 182(1):18-27; Barnett et al., AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1998 October; 14 Suppl 3:S299-309; Dunachie et al., J Exp Biol 2003 November; 206(Pt 21):3771-9; McMichael, Annu Rev Immunol 2006; 24:227-55; Moore et al., Immunol Rev 2004 June; 199:126-43). The enhanced responses observed in these studies have been attributed to amplification of the relevant population of antigen-specific T-cells, but again, a diversified prime-boost approach was used to achieve these results.

Accordingly, despite advances in cancer therapy and infectious disease immunotherapy/vaccine technology, there remains an urgent need to improve safe and effective immunotherapy approaches to the treatment such diseases.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention relates to a method to prevent, ameliorate or treat at least one symptom of a cancer in an individual, to increase survival of an individual with cancer, and/or to induce a therapeutic immune response against one or more cancer antigens in the individual. The method includes the step of administering to the individual: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant vaccinia virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding at least one costimulatory molecule and nucleic acid sequences encoding at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle comprising at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. The first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently to the individual. In one aspect, the recombinant vaccinia virus comprises nucleic acid sequences encoding costimulatory molecules B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method to prevent, ameliorate or treat at least one symptom of a cancer in an individual, to increase survival of an individual with cancer, and/or to induce a therapeutic immune response against one or more cancer antigens in the individual. The method includes a step of administering to the individual: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising: (i) a recombinant vaccinia virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 or biologically active portions thereof, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (ii) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding GM-CSF or a biologically active portion thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle comprising at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. The first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently to the individual. In one aspect of this embodiment, at least one week after the first administration, the method additionally includes the step of administering to the individual: (a) a third immunotherapy composition comprising: (i) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-1 or biologically active portions thereof, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding the at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (ii) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding GM-CSF or a biologically active portion thereof; and (b) the second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle comprising the at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. The second and third immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently to the individual.

Yet another embodiment of the invention relates to the use of a combination of immunotherapy compositions in the preparation of medicaments for concurrent administration to an individual to prevent, ameliorate or treat at least one symptom of cancer in the individual, or to increase survival of an individual who has cancer, and/or to induce a therapeutic immune response against one or more antigens in the individual. The immunotherapy compositions comprise: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising: (i) a recombinant vaccinia virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 or biologically active portions thereof, and nucleic acid sequences encoding at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (ii) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding GM-CSF or a biologically active portion thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle comprising at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, the immunotherapy compositions further comprise a third immunotherapy composition comprising: (i) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 or biologically active portions thereof, and nucleic acid sequences encoding the at least one cancer antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (ii) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding GM-CSF or a biologically active portion thereof.

One embodiment of the invention relates to a method to prevent, ameliorate or treat at least one symptom of a disease or condition in an individual. The method includes a step of administering to the individual: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. The first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently to the individual.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method to induce a therapeutic immune response against one or more antigens in an individual. The method includes the step of administering to the individual: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. The first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently to the individual.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method to increase survival of an individual who has a disease or condition. The method includes a step of administering to the individual: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. The first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently to the individual.

Yet another embodiment of the invention relates to the use of a combination of immunotherapy compositions in the preparation of medicaments for concurrent administration to an individual to prevent, ameliorate or treat at least one symptom of a disease or condition in the individual. The immunotherapy compositions include: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. The compositions are formulated for concurrent administration.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to the use of a combination of immunotherapy compositions in the preparation of medicaments for concurrent administration to an individual to induce a therapeutic immune response against one or more antigens in the individual. The immunotherapy compositions comprise: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. One or both of the first and second immunotherapy compositions comprises at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. The compositions are formulated for concurrent administration.

Yet another embodiment of the invention relates to the use of a combination of immunotherapy compositions in the preparation of medicaments for concurrent administration to an individual who has a disease or condition to increase survival of the individual. The immunotherapy compositions comprise: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. One or both of the first and second immunotherapy compositions comprises at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. The compositions are formulated for concurrent administration.

Yet another embodiment of the invention relates to a composition comprising: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle. One or both of the first and second immunotherapy compositions comprises at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. The first and second immunotherapy compositions are provided in admixture.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a kit comprising the following immunotherapy compositions: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant vaccinia virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding at least one costimulatory molecule and nucleic acid sequences encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle comprising at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, the recombinant vaccinia virus comprises nucleic acid sequences encoding costimulatory molecules B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3. In one aspect, the antigen is a cancer antigen. In one aspect, the antigen is a modified CEA comprising a CAP-1-6D epitope. Other aspects of the kit of the invention are described below.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to a kit comprising the following immunotherapy compositions: (a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising: (i) a recombinant vaccinia virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 or biologically active portions thereof, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (ii) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding GM-CSF or a biologically active portion thereof; and (b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle comprising at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, the kit further comprises a third immunotherapy composition comprising: (i) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding B7-1, ICAM-1 and LFA-3 or biologically active portions thereof, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding the at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof; and (ii) a recombinant fowlpox virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding GM-CSF or a biologically active portion thereof. In one aspect, the antigen is a cancer antigen. In one aspect, the antigen is a modified CEA comprising a CAP-1-6D epitope. Other aspects of the kit of the invention are described below.

In any of the embodiments described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, one or both of the first and second immunotherapy compositions (and/or third immunotherapy composition, in particular embodiments) comprises at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, both the first and second immunotherapy compositions (and/or third immunotherapy composition, in particular embodiments) comprise at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, the first immunotherapy composition comprises at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof, and the second does not. In one aspect, the second immunotherapy composition comprises at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof, and the first does not. In one aspect, each of the first and second immunotherapy compositions comprises the same antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, the first and second immunotherapy compositions (and/or third immunotherapy composition, in particular embodiments) comprise different antigens or immunogenic domains thereof.

In one aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the first and/or third immunotherapy composition comprises a recombinant virus comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences encoding one or more immunostimulatory molecules. In one aspect, the first and/or third immunotherapy composition comprises a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof and a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof, and a recombinant virus comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences encoding one or more immunostimulatory molecules. In one aspect, the first and/or third immunotherapy composition comprises a recombinant virus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding the at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof and one or more nucleic acid sequences encoding one or more immunostimulatory molecules.

In one aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the recombinant virus or viruses in the first and/or third immunotherapy composition is a poxvirus. In one aspect, the recombinant virus or viruses in the first and/or third immunotherapy composition is a recombinant vaccinia virus. In one aspect, the vaccinia virus is modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA). In one aspect, the recombinant virus or viruses in the first and/or third immunotherapy composition is a fowlpox virus.

In one aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the immunostimulatory molecules comprise one or more costimulatory molecules. In one aspect, the immunostimulatory molecules include, but are not limited to, B7.1 (B7-1), B7.2 (B7-2), ICAM-1, LFA-3, 4-1BBL, CD59, CD40, CD40L and/or CD70. In one aspect, the immunostimulatory molecules comprise one, two or all three of B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3. In one aspect, the immunostimulatory molecules comprise one or more cytokines, including, but not limited to, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IFN-α, IFN-λ, interleukin-12 (IL-12), RANTES, and interleukin-2 (IL-2). In one aspect, the cytokine is granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

In one aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the second immunotherapy composition comprises a yeast vehicle that expresses at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof. In one aspect, the yeast vehicle in the second immunotherapy composition is a whole yeast. In one aspect, the yeast vehicle in the second immunotherapy composition is a whole, heat-killed yeast. In one aspect, the yeast vehicle in the second immunotherapy composition is from Saccharomyces.

In one aspect of any of the method or use embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), the first and second immunotherapy compositions (and/or third immunotherapy composition in certain embodiments) are administered to different sites in the individual. In another aspect, the first and second (and/or third) immunotherapy compositions are administered to the same site or to adjacent sites in the individual.

In another aspect of any of the method or use embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), the method or use further comprises a step of boosting the individual with one or both (or all three, in certain embodiments) of the immunotherapy compositions. In one aspect, the individual is boosted with the second immunotherapy composition more frequently than with the first immunotherapy composition.

In another aspect of any of the method or use embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), wherein there is a first and second immunotherapy composition, the method or use further comprises a step of boosting the individual with a third immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof that is different from the first immunotherapy composition. For example, in one aspect, the first immunotherapy composition comprises a recombinant vaccinia virus, and the third immunotherapy composition comprises a fowlpox virus.

In one aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein, including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, either the first or the second immunotherapy composition is administered more frequently than the other. For example, in one aspect, when the first immunotherapy composition is a virus-based immunotherapy composition, and the second immunotherapy composition is a yeast-based immunotherapy composition, the second immunotherapy composition may be administered more frequently than the first immunotherapy composition. For example, in one aspect, in between concurrent administrations of the first and second immunotherapy composition, the second immunotherapy composition may be administered one, two, three or more additional times.

In another aspect of any of the method or use embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), the method further comprises a step of boosting the individual with another source of the antigen or immunogenic domain thereof.

In another aspect of any of the method or use embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), the method further comprises a step of administering at least one biological response modifier to the individual.

In one aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the individual has cancer. In one aspect, the method or use reduces tumor burden or inhibits tumor growth in the individual. In one aspect of any embodiment of the invention, including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the antigen is from a cancer selected from the group of: melanomas, squamous cell carcinoma, breast cancers, head and neck carcinomas, thyroid carcinomas, soft tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, testicular cancers, prostatic cancers, ovarian cancers, bladder cancers, skin cancers, brain cancers, angiosarcomas, hemangiosarcomas, mast cell tumors, leukemias, lymphomas, primary hepatic cancers, lung cancers, pancreatic cancers, gastrointestinal cancers, renal cell carcinomas, hematopoietic neoplasias or metastatic cancers thereof. In one aspect, the antigen is selected from the group of: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), point mutated Ras oncoprotein, Brachyury, MUC-1, EGFR, BCR-Abl, MART-1, MAGE-1, MAGE-3, GAGE, GP-100, MUC-2, normal and point mutated p53 oncoproteins, PSMA, tyrosinase, TRP-1 (gp75), NY-ESO-1, TRP-2, TAG72, KSA, CA-125, PSA, HER-2/neu/c-erb/B2, hTERT, p73, B-RAF, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), Myc, von Hippel-Lindau protein (VHL), Rb-1, Rb-2, androgen receptor (AR), Smad4, MDR1, Flt-3, BRCA-1, BRCA-2, pax3-fkhr, ews-fli-1, HERV-H, HERV-K, TWIST, Mesothelin, NGEP, modifications of such antigens, splice variants of such antigens, and epitope agonists of such antigens, as well as combinations of such antigens, and/or immunogenic domains thereof, modifications thereof, variants thereof, and/or epitope agonists thereof. In one aspect, the antigen is carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), which in one embodiment, comprises a CAP1-6D epitope. In one aspect, the antigen is a modified CEA comprising a CAP-1-6D epitope. In one aspect, the CEA comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:2 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:1). In another aspect, the antigen is mutated Ras. In one aspect, the antigen is a multi-domain fusion protein, comprising one or more fragments of Ras, each fragment comprising one or more mutations at position 12, 13, 59, 61 and/or 76 of Ras. In one aspect, the Ras fusion protein has an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:4 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:3), SEQ ID NO:6 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:5), SEQ ID NO:8 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:7), and/or SEQ ID NO:10 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:9). In one aspect, the antigen is Brachyury. In one aspect, the antigen is MUC-1. In one aspect, the antigen is EGFR. In one aspect, the antigen is BCR-Abl.

In one aspect of any of the method or use embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), the method or use further includes a step of treating the individual with chemotherapy, and/or treating the individual with radiation therapy.

In another aspect of any of the embodiments or aspects of the invention described herein (above or below), including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the individual has a disease caused by or associated with a pathogen. In one aspect, the method or use reduces or prevents infection of the individual by the pathogen. In one aspect, the method or use reduces pathogen titer in the individual.

In one aspect of any embodiment of the invention, including any of the embodiments related to a method, use, composition or kit of the invention, the antigen is selected from the group of: viral antigens, fungal antigens, bacterial antigens, helminth antigens, parasitic antigens, ectoparasite antigens, and protozoan antigens. In one aspect, the antigen is from a virus selected from: adenoviruses, arena viruses, bunyaviruses, coronaviruses, coxsackie viruses, cytomegaloviruses, Epstein-Barr viruses, flaviviruses, hepadnaviruses, hepatitis viruses, herpes viruses, influenza viruses, lentiviruses, measles viruses, mumps viruses, myxoviruses, oncogenic viruses, orthomyxoviruses, papilloma viruses, papovaviruses, parainfluenza viruses, paramyxoviruses, parvoviruses, picornaviruses, pox viruses, rabies viruses, respiratory syncytial viruses, reoviruses, rhabdoviruses, rubella viruses, togaviruses, varicella viruses, and T-lymphotrophic viruses. In one aspect, the antigen is from an infectious agent from a genus selected from the group consisting of: Aspergillus, Bordatella, Brugia, Candida, Chlamydia, Coccidia, Cryptococcus, Dirofilaria, Escherichia, Francisella, Gonococcus, Histoplasma, Leishmania, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasma, Paramecium, Pertussis, Plasmodium, Pneumococcus, Pneumocystis, Rickettsia, Salmonella, Shigella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Toxoplasma, Vibriocholerae, and Yersinia. In one aspect, the antigen is from a bacterium from a genus selected from: Pseudomonas, Bordetella, Mycobacterium, Vibrio, Bacillus, Salmonella, Francisella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Enterococcus, Pasteurella, and Yersinia.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES OF THE INVENTION

FIGS. 1A-1I are graphs showing that vaccination with rV-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA induces differential serum cytokine profiles (FIG. 1A=MIP1α, FIG. 1B=RANTES, FIG. 1C=GM-CSF, FIG. 1D=IL-6, FIG. 1E=IL-12p70, FIG. 1F=IL-13, FIG. 1G=IL-1α, FIG. 1H=IL-1β and FIG. 1I=IL-5.

FIGS. 2A-2F show that distinct TCR repertoires are induced from vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA (Vα profiles are shown for no treatment (FIG. 2A), rV/F-CEA/TRICOM (FIG. 2B), and yeast-CEA (FIG. 2C), and Vβ profiles are shown for no treatment (FIG. 2D), rV/F-CEA/TRICOM (FIG. 2E), and yeast-CEA (FIG. 2F).

FIG. 3A shows the discrete, non-overlapping CEA-526 and CEA-572 epitopes on the A3 loop of domain III of CEA.

FIGS. 3B-3C show that vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA induces distinct cytokine profiles in response to in vitro stimulation with two discrete CEA-specific epitopes, CEA-526 (FIG. 3B) and CEA-572 (FIG. 3C).

FIGS. 4A-4D show that T-cell lines specific for the CEA-572 epitope from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA have distinct TCR Vα profiles (Vα TCR repertoires of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM T-cell lines (black bars) maintained in the presence of CEA-526 peptide (FIG. 4A) and CEA-572 peptide (FIG. 4B); Vα TCR repertoires of yeast-CEA T cell lines (white bars) maintained in the presence of CEA-526 peptide (FIG. 4C) and CEA-572 peptide (FIG. 4D)).

FIGS. 5A-5F show that epitope-specific T-cell lines generated from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA have similar levels of lytic activity but unique avidity (FIGS. 5A and 5C show T cell lines generated from rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccination and specific for CEA-526 peptide (FIG. 5A) and CEA-572 peptide (FIG. 5C); FIGS. 5B and 5D show T-cell lines generated from yeast-CEA vaccination and specific for CEA-526 peptide (FIG. 5B) and CEA-572 peptide (FIG. 5D); FIGS. 5E and 5F show T-cell lines specific for CEA-572 epitope, generated from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM (FIG. 5E) or yeast-CEA (FIG. 5F)).

FIG. 6 shows that concurrently administering rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA vaccines in an orthotopic pulmonary metastasis model increases antitumor efficacy.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the concurrent use of two immunotherapeutic compositions (also referred to herein as vaccines) for the induction of therapeutic immune responses and/or for the prevention, amelioration and/or treatment of disease, including, but not limited to, cancer and infectious disease. More specifically, using recombinant virus immunotherapeutic vaccines and yeast-based immunotherapeutic vaccines, each targeting the same antigen or immunogenic domain thereof, both the vaccine vectors and the antigen are demonstrated herein to have a role in the induction of T-cell populations having both shared and unique cytokine responses, gene expression profiles, and T-cell receptor phenotypes. Accordingly, both the antigen and the vector play a role in the induction of distinct T-cell populations. The studies presented herein indicate that phenotypically and functionally distinct T-cell populations are induced by two vector platforms targeting the same antigen. Finally, the inventors have demonstrated that the two vaccines can be combined concurrently to improve therapeutic efficacy, showing that the concurrent administration of the vaccines improved antitumor efficacy in the experiments described herein. These results indicate a therapeutic benefit from the concurrent administration of two distinct vector platforms targeting a single antigen, due to the induction of a more diverse T-cell population and improved therapeutic efficacy.

This study is believed to be the first to demonstrate effective concurrent administration of two different vaccine vectors targeting the same antigen. While it had been previously shown that each of the vaccines used in the studies described herein individually induce similar levels of CD4+ T-cell proliferation and CD8+ T-cell cytolytic activity (Wansley et al., Clin Cancer Res, 2008 Jul. 1; 14(13):4316-25), the discovery that these vaccines induce phenotypically and functionally distinct T-cell populations, and that the vaccines can be combined concurrently to substantially improve antitumor efficacy, was not known or anticipated.

In contrast to prior studies showing that the functionality of T-cell populations induced by two different vaccine platforms (rV and recombinant adenovirus) targeting the same antigen (OVA) did not differ (Millar et al., 2007, Cell Immunol 250(1-2):55-67), the present invention provides evidence that both the vector and the antigen affect the functionality of the T-cell population induced by two different immunotherapeutic vaccines, one a virus-based immunotherapy composition (referred to herein as rV-CEA/TRICOM) and one a yeast-based immunotherapy composition (referred to herein as yeast-CEA). Comparing the T-cell populations induced by both vaccines in terms of cytokine production, gene expression, and TCR profiling, the studies presented herein found that rV-CEA/TRICOM induces a Th1 response and CD8+ T-cells with a Tc1 phenotype, while yeast-CEA induces a mixed Th1/Th2 response and CD8+ T-cells with a mixed Tc1/Tc2 phenotype (FIGS. 1 and 3). Up-regulation of genes involved in immune cell migration and TCR signaling and T-cell proliferation was observed by both vaccines (Table 1). Interestingly, although these vaccines modulate the expression of genes involved in various cellular pathways in an apparent disadvantageous manner, antigen-specific immune responses or antitumor efficacy is not abrogated (Wansley et al., Clin Cancer Res 2008 Jul. 1; 14(13):4316-25). It is also demonstrated herein that the T-cell populations induced by either vaccine have both shared and unique Vα and Vβ TCR gene usage (FIG. 2) and that T-cell lines created from vaccinated CEA-Tg mice, specific for one of two CEA epitopes demonstrate differential avidity and antigen-specific cytolytic activity (FIG. 5). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the two immunotherapeutic vaccines induce distinct T-cell populations, and the differences in the phenotype and function of these T-cell populations may be attributed to both the vector and the antigen. These findings are applicable to the use of any antigen in the context of the immunotherapy compositions.

The mode of antigen delivery by either vaccine platform may influence the generation of these distinct responses. The mechanism by which yeast-CEA predominantly activates the immune response is through the uptake of the CEA-expressing yeast and subsequent processing and presentation of the CEA antigen by dendritic cells (DCs) (Bernstein et al., Vaccine 2008 Jan. 24; 26(4):509-21), while the rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vectors infect cells, inducing intracellular expression that allows the CEA antigen to be processed and presented (Hodge et al., Cancer Res 1999 Nov. 15; 59(22):5800-7). Another difference observed is that rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccination induces the production of CEA-specific antibody while yeast-CEA does not (data not shown). Such mechanistic differences in the activation of the cellular and humoral arms of the immune system may also influence the vector- and antigen-specific induction of distinct T-cell populations.

Surprisingly, the inventors discovered that administering two vaccines targeting the same antigen induces distinct T-cell populations and results in significantly higher antitumor immunity in a murine orthotopic pulmonary metastasis model (FIG. 6). This study also showed for the first time that two vaccine platforms targeting the same antigen could be concurrently administered due to their induction of distinct T-cell populations. Furthermore, these data show that concurrent administration of the two vaccines results in substantially increased antitumor effects, due to the induction of a more diverse T-cell population targeting the same antigen. These findings indicate that concurrently combining these vaccines can be utilized to increase antigen-specific immunity. The concurrent use of immunotherapeutic vaccines as described herein induces a more diverse T-cell population consisting of T cells generated from both vaccines, making a diversified prime-boost schedule used prior to the invention unnecessary, although combining a diversified prime-boost schedule with the concurrent administration protocol described herein may further enhance an effective immune response. The present invention maximizes the immune response beginning with the initial vaccination by inducing a more diverse T-cell population that is then boosted and expanded in magnitude with each subsequent vaccination. Such a strategy would be efficacious in cancer patients as well as patients suffering from chronic infectious disease, because a more diverse T-cell population would be induced early in their treatment.

Accordingly, the present invention relates to the concurrent use of two or more different immunotherapy compositions to induce therapeutic immune responses against one or more antigens, and/or to prevent, ameliorate and/or treat a disease or condition, including cancer or an infectious disease. In one embodiment, the two or more different immunotherapy compositions target the same antigen(s). In another embodiment, one of the two or more different immunotherapy compositions targets one or more antigens, and the other of the immunotherapy compositions is provided as an adjuvant, without necessarily targeting an antigen, or without necessarily targeting the same antigen as the other composition (i.e., in one embodiment, the second composition targets a different antigen). In one embodiment, which may include any combinations of the embodiments above, the two or more immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently, but to different physical sites in the patient. In another embodiment, which may include any combination of the embodiments above, the two or more different immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently and to the same, or substantially adjacent, site in the patient.

The two or more different immunotherapy compositions used in the present invention are each capable, individually, of inducing an immune response, and preferably, at least a cellular immune response, and more preferably, a T cell-mediated cellular immune response. In one aspect, at least one of the compositions is capable of inducing a CD8+ and/or a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response and more preferably, a CD8+ and a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response. Preferably, all of the compositions used concurrently according to the invention are capable of inducing a CD8+ and/or a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response, and more preferably, a CD8+ and a CD4+ immune response. Optionally, at least one of the compositions is capable of eliciting a humoral immune response. Preferably, the T cell-mediated immune response that is elicited by one of the immunotherapy compositions is phenotypically and/or functionally distinct in one or more aspects from the T cell-mediated immune response that is elicited by the other immunotherapy composition. In one aspect, the immunotherapeutic composition has one or more of the following characteristics: (a) stimulates one or more pattern recognition receptors effective to activate an antigen presenting cell; (b) upregulates adhesion molecules, co-stimulatory molecules, and MHC class I and/or class II molecules on antigen presenting cells; (c) induces production of proinflammatory cytokines by antigen presenting cells; (d) induces production of Th1-type cytokines by T cells; (e) induces production of Th17-type cytokines by T cells; (f) inhibits or downregulates Treg; and/or (g) elicits MHC Class I and/or MHC Class II, antigen-specific immune responses. Suitable immunotherapeutic compositions can include yeast-based immunotherapy compositions, viral-based immunotherapy compositions, antibody-based immunotherapy compositions, DNA immunotherapy compositions, subunit vaccines, and any components or adjuvants useful for stimulating or modulating an immune response, such as TLR agonists, cytokines, immune potentiators, and other agents, and any combinations thereof, many of which are described in more detail below. In one aspect, immunotherapy compositions to be used in the present invention include recombinant virus-based compositions and yeast-based compositions (described in detail below).

Virus-Based Immunotherapy Compositions

One aspect of the invention relates to a recombinant virus-based immunotherapy composition (which phrase may be used interchangeably with “virus-based immunotherapy product”, “virus-based composition”, “virus-based immunotherapeutic”, “virus-based vaccine”, “immunotherapy composition comprising or including a recombinant virus or recombinant viral vector”, or any similar derivation of these phrases). As used herein, the phrase virus-based immunotherapy composition” refers to a composition that includes a viral vector component (e.g., a recombinant virus or portion thereof effective to constitute a viral vector) and that elicits an immune response sufficient to achieve at least one therapeutic benefit in a subject. Virus-based immunotherapy compositions and methods of making and generally using the same, are described in detail, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,045,802, 6,893,869, 6,548,068, and 6,969,609, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In one aspect, a virus-based immunotherapy composition useful in the invention is capable of inducing a CD8+ and/or a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response and in one aspect, a CD8+ and a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response, and in one aspect, a humoral immune response. A virus-based immunotherapy composition useful in the present invention can, for example, elicit an immune response in an individual such that the individual is treated for the disease or condition, or such that symptoms resulting from the disease or condition are alleviated or treated.

A virus-based immunotherapy composition typically comprises a viral vector comprising a virus genome or portions thereof (e.g., a recombinant virus) and a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen(s) from a disease causing agent or disease state (e.g., a cancer antigen(s), infectious disease antigen(s), and/or at least one immunogenic domain thereof). In some embodiments, a virus-based immunotherapy composition further includes at least one viral vector comprising one or more nucleic acid sequences encoding one or more immunostimulatory molecule(s). In some embodiments, the genes encoding immunostimulatory molecules and antigens are inserted into the same viral vector (the same recombinant virus).

Viruses that may be used in such immunotherapy compositions of the present invention are any viruses that infect cells, inducing intracellular expression of the antigen carried by the virus that allows the antigen to be processed and presented. Preferred among these viruses are those that induce a Th1 response and CD8+ T-cells with a Tc1 phenotype. Viruses that may be used in a composition of the invention include viruses in which a portion of the genome can be deleted to introduce new genes without destroying infectivity of the virus.

Parental viruses (i.e., viruses from which viral vectors/recombinant viruses are produced, derived, based, etc.) useful in the production of viral vectors of the invention include, but are not limited to, poxvirus, Herpes virus, adenovirus, alphavirus, retrovirus, picornavirus, baculovirus, and iridovirus. Poxviruses (members of the family Poxviridae) having utility in the present invention include replicating and non-replicating vectors. Such poxviruses include, but are not limited to, orthopox (genus Orthopoxvirus) such as vaccinia virus (Perkus et al., Science 229:981-984, 1985; Kaufman et al., Int. J. Cancer 48:900-907, 1991, Moss, Science 252:1662, 1991), raccoon pox, rabbit pox and the like, avipox (genus Avipoxvirus) including fowlpox virus, suipox (genus Suipoxvirus), capripox (genus Capripoxvirus) and the like. Poxviruses may be selected from the group of vaccinia-Copenhagen, vaccinia-Wyeth strain, highly attenuated vaccinia virus (vaccinia-MVA strain), modified vaccinia Ankara (Sutter and Moss, Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89:10847-10851; Sutter et al., Virology 1994), NYVAC, TROVAC, canarypox, ALVAC (Baxby and Paoletti, Vaccine 10:8-9, 1992; Rinns, M. M. et al., (Eds) Recombinant Poxviruses CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton 1992; Paoletti, E., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 93:11349-11353, 1996), swinepox, and the like. A derivative of the vaccinia-Wyeth strain includes but is not limited to vTBC33 which lacks a functional K1L gene. In yet another embodiment, the virus is Dry-Vax available as a smallpox vaccine from the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga. In one embodiment, the recombinant vector is a vaccinia virus. In another embodiment, the recombinant vector is from fowlpox virus. One strain of fowlpox virus, for example, is POXVAC-TC (Schering-Plough Corporation).

Recombinant poxviruses having utility in the present invention have a number of attributes, including (i) efficient delivery of genes to multiple cell types, including antigen presenting cells (APC) and tumor cells; (ii) high levels of protein expression; (iii) optimal presentation of antigens to the immune system; (iv) the ability to elicit cell-mediated immune responses as well as antibody responses; (v) transient, rather than permanent, genetic modification of cells, and (vi) the ability to use combinations of poxviruses from different genera, as they are not immunologically cross-reactive.

Recombinant vaccinia (rV, rMVA) and recombinant fowlpox (rF) viruses are two exemplary viruses for use in the virus-based immunotherapy compositions of the invention. Recombinant vaccinia and fowlpox viruses containing murine B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 genes as well as the human CEA gene (rV/F-CEA/TRICOM) have been described (Hodge et al., Cancer Res 1999 Nov. 15; 59(22):5800-7; Grosenbach et al., Cancer Res 2001 Jun. 1; 61(11):4497-505; and Hodge et al., Cancer Res 2003 Nov. 15; 63:7942-7949), each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The murine GM-CSF-expressing rF virus (rF-GM-CSF) has been previously described (Kass et al., Cancer Res 2001 Jan. 1; 61(1):206-14). For purposes of the present invention, a vaccine designated “rV/F-CEA/TRICOM” refers to a complete vaccine protocol that includes a priming with rV-CEA/TRICOM (recombinant vaccinia containing polynucleotides encoding B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3 and CEA) admixed with rF-GM-CSF (recombinant fowl pox containing a gene encoding GM-CSF) which is boosted every 7 days with rF-CEA/TRICOM recombinant fowlpox containing polynucleotides encoding B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3 and CEA) admixed with rF-GM-CSF. It is to be understood that CEA is just one example of a suitable antigen (in this case, a tumor-associated or cancer antigen) to be used in connection with one or more immunotherapy compositions of the invention.

The viral vector of the present invention comprises at least one expression control element operably linked to the nucleic acid sequence. The expression control elements are inserted in the vector to control and regulate the expression of the nucleic acid sequence (Ausubel et al, 1987, in “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.). Expression control elements are known in the art and include promoters. Promoters useful in the present invention are poxviral promoters as are known in the art which include, but are not limited to, 30K, I3, sE/L, 7.5K, 40K, and C1. The nucleic acid sequence of the 30K promoter is disclosed in GenBank Accession No. M35027 at base numbers 28,012 through 28,423 (antisense). The nucleic acid sequence of 13 is disclosed in GenBank Accession No. J03399 at base numbers 1100 through 1301 (antisense). The nucleic acid sequence of the 7.5K promoter is disclosed in GenBank Accession No. M35027 at base numbers 186550 through 186680. The nucleic acid sequence of the 40K promoter is disclosed in GenBank Accession No. M13209 at base numbers 9700 through 9858 (antisense). The nucleic acid sequence of the C1 promoter is disclosed in GenBank Accession No. M59027 at base numbers 1 through 242 and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,258. The sequence of the sE/L promoter is known in the art. Other poxvirus promoters may be used, such as, those described by Davison and Moss (J. Mol. Biol. 210:749-769. (1989). Any of these promoters can be synthesized by using standard methods in the art. The selection of an appropriate promoter is based on its timing and level of expression. Early or early/late promoters are used in one aspect. In one embodiment, the promoter or combination of promoters utilized allow for optimal expression of each antigen and/or costimulatory molecule in an infected host to provide a synergistic immune response. In one embodiment, each nucleic acid molecule encoding an antigen or costimulatory molecule is controlled by a separate and distinct promoter.

As used herein with any immunotherapy composition described for use in the present invention, immunostimulatory molecules include, but are not limited to, cytokines and costimulatory molecules. For example, cytokines can include, but are not limited to, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IFN-α, IFN-λ, interleukin-12 (IL-12), RANTES, and interleukin-2 (IL-2). Costimulatory molecules include, but are not limited to, B7.1 (also referred to herein as B7-1), B7.2 (also referred to herein as B7-2), ICAM-1, LFA-3, 4-1BBL, CD59, CD40, CD40L and CD70. Immunostimulatory molecules can be provided in an immunotherapy composition of the invention alone and/or in a variety of combinations, and can be expressed by one or more viral vectors or other vaccine vectors. In one aspect, the recombinant vector of the present invention comprises genes encoding at least three costimulatory molecules for synergistic enhancement of immune responses which is not obtainable by the use of a single or a double costimulatory molecule. Genes encoding various combinations of costimulatory molecules are an element of the invention for use in the recombinant vector and may include such combinations as: B7.1, B7.2, ICAM-1, and LFA-3; B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3; B7.1, B7.2, ICAM-1, and 4-1BBL; B7.1, B7.2, ICAM-1, LFA-3, and 4-1BBL; CD59 and VCAM-1; and B7.1 and B7.2; CD59, CD40, 4-BBL, CD70 and VCAM-1, B7.1, B7.2; OX-40L, 4-1BBL; depending on the desired immune response and the disease or condition to be treated. B7.1 (CD80) is a natural ligand for the T-cell antigen, CD28, mediating T- and B-cell adhesion. B7.1 is expressed on activated B-cells and gamma-interferon-stimulated monocytes. The binding of CD80 to CD28 and CTLA-4 provides a co-stimulatory signal to T-cells and leads to upregulated lymphokine production. B7.2 (CD86) is an alternative ligand for CD28 and CTLA-4.

ICAM-1 (Inter-Cellular Adhesion Molecule 1), also known as CD54, is a leukocyte- and endothelial-associated intercellular adhesion molecule and is a ligand for LFA-1 (integrin), a leukocyte receptor. ICAM-1 is upregulated upon cytokine stimulation and is involved in cellular interactions, leukocyte endothelial transmigration, and signaling related to recruitment of proinflammatory immune cells.

LFA-3 (lymphocyte function associated antigen-3), or CD58, is an adhesion molecule expressed by antigen presenting cells (APCs), mediating a costimulatory signal through CD2, an adhesion molecule found on T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. This interaction promotes intercellular adhesion and the activation of T cells.

4-1BBL is expressed on activated antigen presenting cells (APCs) and is the ligand for 4-1BB, a costimulatory member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family expressed on activated CD4 and CD8 T cells. The interaction of these molecules can enhance T cell proliferation and survival, and expand and activate CD8+ T cell memory (Bukczynski et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101(5):1291-6).

CD59 is a complement regulatory protein. Viruses, including vaccinia virus, vaccinia incorporate host cell CD59 into their own viral envelope to prevent lysis by complement (Bohana-Kashtan et al., 2004, Mol. Immunol. 41 (6-7): 583-97).

VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1), or CD106, is an adhesion molecule expressed by endothelial cells and mediates the adhesion of lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils to vascular endothelium. It also functions in leukocyte-endothelial cell signal transduction.

CD40 is a costimulatory protein expressed by antigen presenting cells (APCs). Binding of CD40 to its natural ligand, CD40L, on T cells, activates the APC and initiates a signaling cascade that mediates a variety of immune and inflammatory responses.

CD70 is a ligand for CD27, which is a receptor required for the generation and maintenance of long-term T cell immunity.

OX40-L is expressed on expressed on the surface of activated B cells, T cells, dendritic cells and endothelial cells and binds to its natural receptor, OX40, which is primarily expressed by activated CD4+ T cells, and therefore, this interaction is related to T cell activation.

GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor) is a cytokine that functions as a white blood cell growth factor produced by T cells, macrophages, and other cells. GM-CSF stimulates stem cells to produce granulocytes (neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils) and monocytes, and is thus part of the immune system activation and development process.

Simultaneous production of an immunostimulatory molecule and the antigen(s) at the site of virus replication/infection (in any case, the site of antigen production) enhances the generation of specific effectors. Dependent upon the specific immunostimulatory molecules, different mechanisms might be responsible for the enhanced immunogenicity: augmentation of help signal (IL-2), recruitment of professional APC (GM-CSF), increase in CTL frequency (IL-2), and/or effect on antigen processing pathway and MHC expression (IFN-γ and TNFα). In some cases, it may be beneficial to produce a recombinant virus comprising more than one antigen of interest for the purpose of having a multivalent vaccine.

In one embodiment, a pharmaceutical composition comprises a recombinant virus (e.g., a poxvirus) containing nucleic acid molecules encoding multiple costimulatory molecules in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The recombinant virus may further comprise a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof or alternatively, a second recombinant virus (e.g., a poxvirus) may be provided encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof.

In one embodiment, a virus-based immunotherapy composition useful in the present invention includes a pharmaceutical composition comprising a recombinant virus (e.g., a recombinant poxvirus) comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding B7.1 or B7.2, a nucleic acid sequence encoding ICAM-1, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding LFA-3 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In addition to the B7, ICAM-1, LFA-3 construct, the recombinant virus of the pharmaceutical composition may additionally comprise a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof, or alternatively, the nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof may be provided in the composition by a second recombinant virus.

In one embodiment, the composition may also comprise exogenously added immunostimulatory molecules as are known in the art including, but not limited to, the costimulatory molecules B7, ICAM-1, LFA-3, 4-1BBL, CD59, CD40, CD70, VCAM-1, OX-40L and/or antibodies that bind to such immunostimulatory molecules, and/or agonists or antagonists of such immunostimulatory molecules, and/or cytokines and chemokines including but not limited to IL-2, GM-CSF, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IFN-α, IFN-λ, IL-12, RANTES, MIP-1α, Flt-3L (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,554,512; 5,843,423) and the like, for additional synergy or enhancement of an immune response. The cytokines and chemokines themselves may be provided in the composition or, alternatively, the cytokines and chemokines may be provided by a recombinant viral vector encoding the cytokine or chemokine.

In one embodiment of the present invention, a recombinant poxvirus is provided comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding LFA-3 or functional portion thereof under control of a 30K poxviral promoter, a nucleic acid sequence encoding ICAM-1 or portion thereof under control of an I3 poxviral promoter, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding B7.1 or portion thereof under control of an sE/L poxviral promoter. The recombinant poxvirus may further provide a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a recombinant poxvirus is provided comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding B7.1 under control of a sE/L poxviral promoter, a nucleic acid sequence encoding LFA-3 or portion thereof under control of the I3 poxviral promoter, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding ICAM-1 or portion thereof under control of the 7.5K poxvirus promoter. Optionally the construct further comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding at least antigen or immunogenic domain thereof.

In an embodiment of the invention, a recombinant fowlpox virus comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding B7.1 or portion thereof under control of the sE/L poxviral promoter, a nucleic acid sequence encoding LFA-3 or portion thereof under control of the I3 poxviral promoter, and a nucleic acid sequence encoding ICAM-1 or portion thereof under control of the 7.5K poxviral promoter. A recombinant fowlpox virus may further comprise a nucleic acid sequence encoding a target antigen under control of a poxviral promoter such as the 40K poxviral promoter.

In some embodiments of the invention, the recombinant virus-based immunotherapy compositions do not express an antigen, although in such a case, the recombinant viral vector(s) of such compositions preferably still express one or more immunostimulatory molecules as described elsewhere herein. In this embodiment of the invention, the antigen is provided by one or more different immunotherapy compositions as described herein, such as the yeast-based immunotherapy composition of the invention. Because each of the immunotherapy compositions used in the invention may provide some unique “danger signals” or costimulatory signals to the immune system, it may be sufficient to provide the contributions of the vectors while only one of the compositions comprises an antigen.

The present invention further provides methods of generating recombinant viruses comprising nucleic acid sequences encoding antigens and/or multiple costimulatory molecules. One method of generation of recombinant poxviruses is accomplished via homologous recombination in vivo between parental poxvirus genomic DNA and a plasmid vector that carries the heterologous sequences to be inserted, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,258. Plasmid vectors for the insertion of foreign sequences into poxviruses are constructed by standard methods of recombinant DNA technology. The plasmid vectors contain one or more chimeric foreign genes, each comprising a poxvirus promoter linked to a protein coding sequence, flanked by viral sequences from a non-essential region of the poxvirus genome. The plasmid is transfected into cells infected with the parental poxvirus using art accepted transfection methods, and recombination between poxvirus sequences on the plasmid and the corresponding DNA in the parental viral genome results in the insertion into the viral genome of the chimeric foreign genes from the plasmid. Recombinant viruses are selected and purified using any of a variety of selection or screening systems as are known in the art. Insertion of the foreign genes into the vaccinia genome is confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Expression of the foreign genes is demonstrated by Western blot analysis. An alternative method of generation of recombinant poxviruses is accomplished by direct ligation (Pleiderer et al., J. Gen. Virol. 76:2957-2962, 1995; Merchlinsky et al., Virol. 238:444-451, 1997).

Yeast-Based Immunotherapy Compositions

In one embodiment of the invention, the invention includes the use of at least one “yeast-based immunotherapeutic composition” (which phrase may be used interchangeably with “yeast-based immunotherapy product”, “yeast-based composition”, “yeast-based immunotherapeutic”, “yeast-based vaccine”, “immunotherapy composition comprising a yeast vehicle”, or any similar derivation of these phrases). As used herein, the phrase “yeast-based immunotherapy composition” refers to a composition that includes a yeast vehicle component and that elicits an immune response sufficient to achieve at least one therapeutic benefit in a subject. More particularly, a yeast-based immunotherapeutic composition is a composition that includes a yeast vehicle component and can elicit or induce an immune response, such as a cellular immune response, including without limitation a T cell-mediated cellular immune response. In one aspect, a yeast-based immunotherapy composition useful in the invention is capable of inducing a CD8+ and/or a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response and in one aspect, a CD8+ and a CD4+ T cell-mediated immune response. Optionally, a yeast-based immunotherapy composition is capable of eliciting a humoral immune response. A yeast-based immunotherapy composition useful in the present invention can, for example, elicit an immune response in an individual such that the individual is treated for the disease or condition, or such that symptoms resulting from the disease or condition are alleviated or treated.

Typically, a yeast-based immunotherapy composition includes a yeast vehicle and at least one antigen or immunogenic domain thereof expressed by, attached to, or mixed with the yeast vehicle. In some embodiments, the antigen or immunogenic domain thereof is provided as a fusion protein. In one aspect of the invention, fusion protein can include two or more antigens. In one aspect, the fusion protein can include two or more immunogenic domains of one or more antigens, or two or more epitopes of one or more antigens. A TARMOGEN® is one non-limiting example of a yeast-based immunotherapy composition that is useful in the present invention. A TARMOGEN® (TARgeted MOlecular immunoGEN, GlobeImmune, Inc., Louisville, Colo.) generally refers to a yeast vehicle expressing one or more heterologous antigens extracellularly (on its surface), intracellularly (internally or cytosolically) or both extracellularly and intracellularly.

Yeast-based immunotherapy compositions, and methods of making and generally using the same, are described in detail, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,830,463, 7,083,787, 7,465,454, U.S. Patent Publication 2007-0224208, U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2008-0003239, and in Stubbs et al., Nat. Med. 7:625-629 (2001), Lu et al., Cancer Research 64:5084-5088 (2004), and in Bernstein et al., Vaccine 2008 Jan. 24; 26(4):509-21, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These yeast-based immunotherapeutic products have been shown to elicit immune responses, including cellular and humoral immune responses. Yeast-based immunotherapeutic products are capable of killing target cells expressing a variety of antigens in vivo, in a variety of animal species, and do so via antigen-specific, CD8+ and/or CD4+ mediated immune responses. Additional studies have shown that yeast are avidly phagocytosed by and directly activate dendritic cells which then present yeast-associated proteins to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in a highly efficient manner. See, e.g., Stubbs et al. Nature Med. 5:625-629 (2001) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,083,787.

In any of the yeast-based immunotherapy compositions used in the present invention, the following aspects related to the yeast vehicle are included in the invention. According to the present invention, a yeast vehicle is any yeast cell (e.g., a whole or intact cell) or a derivative thereof (see below) that can be used in conjunction with one or more antigens, immunogenic domains thereof or epitopes thereof in a therapeutic composition of the invention, or in one aspect, the yeast vehicle can be used alone or as an adjuvant. The yeast vehicle can therefore include, but is not limited to, a live intact yeast microorganism (i.e., a yeast cell having all its components including a cell wall), a killed (dead) or inactivated intact yeast microorganism, or derivatives thereof including: a yeast spheroplast (i.e., a yeast cell lacking a cell wall), a yeast cytoplast (i.e., a yeast cell lacking a cell wall and nucleus), a yeast ghost (i.e., a yeast cell lacking a cell wall, nucleus and cytoplasm), a subcellular yeast membrane extract or fraction thereof (also referred to as a yeast membrane particle and previously as a subcellular yeast particle), any other yeast particle, or a yeast cell wall preparation.

Yeast spheroplasts are typically produced by enzymatic digestion of the yeast cell wall. Such a method is described, for example, in Franzusoff et al., 1991, Meth. Enzymol. 194, 662-674, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Yeast cytoplasts are typically produced by enucleation of yeast cells. Such a method is described, for example, in Coon, 1978, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 48, 45-55 incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Yeast ghosts are typically produced by resealing a permeabilized or lysed cell and can, but need not, contain at least some of the organelles of that cell. Such a method is described, for example, in Franzusoff et al., 1983, J. Biol. Chem. 258, 3608-3614 and Bussey et al., 1979, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 553, 185-196, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

A yeast membrane particle (subcellular yeast membrane extract or fraction thereof) refers to a yeast membrane that lacks a natural nucleus or cytoplasm. The particle can be of any size, including sizes ranging from the size of a natural yeast membrane to microparticles produced by sonication or other membrane disruption methods known to those skilled in the art, followed by resealing. A method for producing subcellular yeast membrane extracts is described, for example, in Franzusoff et al., 1991, Meth. Enzymol. 194, 662-674. One may also use fractions of yeast membrane particles that contain yeast membrane portions and, when the antigen or other protein was expressed recombinantly by the yeast prior to preparation of the yeast membrane particles, the antigen or other protein of interest. Antigens or other proteins of interest can be carried inside the membrane, on either surface of the membrane, or combinations thereof (i.e., the protein can be both inside and outside the membrane and/or spanning the membrane of the yeast membrane particle). In one embodiment, a yeast membrane particle is a recombinant yeast membrane particle that can be an intact, disrupted, or disrupted and resealed yeast membrane that includes at least one desired antigen or other protein of interest on the surface of the membrane or at least partially embedded within the membrane.

An example of a yeast cell wall preparation is isolated yeast cell walls carrying an antigen on its surface or at least partially embedded within the cell wall such that the yeast cell wall preparation, when administered to an animal, stimulates a desired immune response against a disease target.

Any yeast strain can be used to produce a yeast vehicle of the present invention. Yeast are unicellular microorganisms that belong to one of three classes: Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes and Fungi Imperfecti. One consideration for the selection of a type of yeast for use as an immune modulator is the pathogenicity of the yeast. In one embodiment, the yeast is a non-pathogenic strain such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The selection of a non-pathogenic yeast strain minimizes any adverse effects to the individual to whom the yeast vehicle is administered. However, pathogenic yeast may be used if the pathogenicity of the yeast can be negated by any means known to one of skill in the art (e.g., mutant strains). In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, nonpathogenic yeast strains are used.

Genera of yeast strains that may be used in the invention include but are not limited to Saccharomyces, Candida (which can be pathogenic), Cryptococcus, Hansenula, Kluyveromyces, Pichia, Rhodotorula, Schizosaccharomyces and Yarrowia. In one aspect, yeast genera are selected from Saccharomyces, Candida, Hansenula, Pichia or Schizosaccharomyces, and in one aspect, Saccharomyces is used. Species of yeast strains that may be used in the invention include but are not limited to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, Candida albicans, Candida kefyr, Candida tropicalis, Cryptococcus laurentii, Cryptococcus neoformans, Hansenula anomala, Hansenula polymorpha, Kluyveromyces fragilis, Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus var. lactis, Pichia pastoris, Rhodotorula rubra, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and Yarrowia lipolytica. It is to be appreciated that a number of these species include a variety of subspecies, types, subtypes, etc. that are intended to be included within the aforementioned species. In one aspect, yeast species used in the invention include S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, H. polymorpha, P. pastoris and S. pombe. S. cerevisiae is useful due to it being relatively easy to manipulate and being “Generally Recognized As Safe” or “GRAS” for use as food additives (GRAS, FDA proposed Rule 62FR18938, Apr. 17, 1997). One embodiment of the present invention is a yeast strain that is capable of replicating plasmids to a particularly high copy number, such as a S. cerevisiae cirº strain. The S. cerevisiae strain is one such strain that is capable of supporting expression vectors that allow one or more target antigen(s) and/or antigen fusion protein(s) and/or other proteins to be expressed at high levels. In addition, any mutant yeast strains can be used in the present invention, including those that exhibit reduced post-translational modifications of expressed target antigens or other proteins, such as mutations in the enzymes that extend N-linked glycosylation.

In one embodiment, a yeast vehicle of the present invention is capable of fusing with the cell type to which the yeast vehicle and antigen/agent is being delivered, such as a dendritic cell or macrophage, thereby effecting particularly efficient delivery of the yeast vehicle, and in many embodiments, the antigen(s) or other agent, to the cell type. As used herein, fusion of a yeast vehicle with a targeted cell type refers to the ability of the yeast cell membrane, or particle thereof, to fuse with the membrane of the targeted cell type (e.g., dendritic cell or macrophage), leading to syncytia formation. As used herein, a syncytium is a multinucleate mass of protoplasm produced by the merging of cells. A number of viral surface proteins (including those of immunodeficiency viruses such as HIV, influenza virus, poliovirus and adenovirus) and other fusogens (such as those involved in fusions between eggs and sperm) have been shown to be able to effect fusion between two membranes (i.e., between viral and mammalian cell membranes or between mammalian cell membranes). For example, a yeast vehicle that produces an HIV gp120/gp41 heterologous antigen on its surface is capable of fusing with a CD4+ T-lymphocyte. It is noted, however, that incorporation of a targeting moiety into the yeast vehicle, while it may be desirable under some circumstances, is not necessary. In the case of yeast vehicles that express antigens extracellularly, this can be a further advantage of the yeast vehicles of the present invention. In general, yeast vehicles useful in the present invention are readily taken up by dendritic cells (as well as other cells, such as macrophages).

In some embodiments of the invention, the yeast-based immunotherapy composition includes at least one antigen, immunogenic domain thereof, or epitope thereof. The antigens contemplated for use in this invention include any antigen against which it is desired to elicit an immune response (described in more detail below).

In some embodiments of the invention, the yeast-based immunotherapy compositions do not express or otherwise contain or display an antigen, although in this case, the yeast vehicle may optionally express one or more immunostimulatory molecules. In this embodiment of the invention, the antigen is provided by one or more different immunotherapy compositions as described herein, such as a virus-based immunotherapy composition. Because each of the immunotherapy compositions used in the invention may provide some unique “danger signals” or costimulatory signals to the immune system, it may be sufficient to provide the contributions of the vectors while only one of the compositions comprises an antigen.

According to the present invention, the term “yeast vehicle-antigen complex” or “yeast-antigen complex” is used generally to describe any association of a yeast vehicle with an antigen, and can be used interchangeably with “yeast-based immunotherapy composition” when such composition is used to elicit an immune response as described above. Such association includes expression of the antigen by the yeast (a recombinant yeast), introduction of an antigen into a yeast, physical attachment of the antigen to the yeast, and mixing of the yeast and antigen together, such as in a buffer or other solution or formulation. These types of complexes are described in detail below.

In one embodiment, a yeast cell (e.g., a whole yeast) used to prepare the yeast vehicle or that is the yeast vehicle is transfected with a heterologous nucleic acid molecule encoding a protein (e.g., the antigen or agent) such that the protein is expressed by the yeast cell. Such a yeast is also referred to herein as a recombinant yeast or a recombinant yeast vehicle. The yeast cell can then be administered, or the yeast cell can be killed, or it can be derivatized such as by formation of yeast spheroplasts, cytoplasts, ghosts, or subcellular particles. Yeast spheroplasts can also be directly transfected with a recombinant nucleic acid molecule (e.g., the spheroplast is produced from a whole yeast, and then transfected) in order to produce a recombinant spheroplast that expresses an antigen or other protein.

In one aspect, a yeast cell or yeast spheroplast used to prepare the yeast vehicle is transfected with a recombinant nucleic acid molecule encoding the antigen(s) or other protein such that the antigen or other protein is recombinantly expressed by the yeast cell or yeast spheroplast. In this aspect, the yeast cell or yeast spheroplast that recombinantly expresses the antigen(s) or other protein is used to produce a yeast vehicle comprising a yeast cytoplast, a yeast ghost, or a yeast membrane particle or yeast cell wall particle, or fraction thereof.

A number of antigens and/or other proteins to be produced by a yeast vehicle of the present invention is any number of antigens and/or other proteins that can be reasonably produced by a yeast vehicle, and typically ranges from at least one to at least about 6 or more, including from about 2 to about 6 heterologous antigens and or other proteins.

Expression of an antigen or other protein in a yeast vehicle of the present invention can be accomplished using techniques known to those skilled in the art. Briefly, in one aspect, a nucleic acid molecule encoding at least one desired antigen or other protein is inserted into an expression vector in such a manner that the nucleic acid molecule is operatively linked to a transcription control sequence in order to be capable of effecting either constitutive or regulated expression of the nucleic acid molecule when transformed into a host yeast cell. Nucleic acid molecules encoding one or more antigens and/or other proteins can be on one or more expression vectors operatively linked to one or more expression control sequences. Particularly important expression control sequences are those which control transcription initiation, such as promoter and upstream activation sequences. Any suitable yeast promoter can be used in the present invention and a variety of such promoters are known to those skilled in the art. Promoters for expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae include, but are not limited to, promoters of genes encoding the following yeast proteins: alcohol dehydrogenase I (ADH1) or II (ADH2), CUP1, phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), triose phosphate isomerase (TPI), translational elongation factor EF-1 alpha (TEF2), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; also referred to as TDH3, for triose phosphate dehydrogenase), galactokinase (GAL1), galactose-1-phosphate uridyl-transferase (GAL7), UDP-galactose epimerase (GAL10), cytochrome c1 (CYC1), Sec7 protein (SECT) and acid phosphatase (PHO5), including hybrid promoters such as ADH2/GAPDH and CYC1/GAL10 promoters, and including the ADH2/GAPDH promoter, which is induced when glucose concentrations in the cell are low (e.g., about 0.1 to about 0.2 percent), as well as the CUP1 promoter and the TEF2 promoter. Likewise, a number of upstream activation sequences (UASs), also referred to as enhancers, are known. Upstream activation sequences for expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae include, but are not limited to, the UASs of genes encoding the following proteins: PCK1, TPI, TDH3, CYC1, ADH1, ADH2, SUC2, GAL1, GAL7 and GAL10, as well as other UASs activated by the GAL4 gene product, with the ADH2 UAS being used in one aspect. Since the ADH2 UAS is activated by the ADR1 gene product, it may be preferable to overexpress the ADR1 gene when a heterologous gene is operatively linked to the ADH2 UAS. Transcription termination sequences for expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae include the termination sequences of the α-factor, GAPDH, and CYC1 genes.

Transcription control sequences to express genes in methyltrophic yeast include the transcription control regions of the genes encoding alcohol oxidase and formate dehydrogenase.

Transfection of a nucleic acid molecule into a yeast cell according to the present invention can be accomplished by any method by which a nucleic acid molecule administered into the cell and includes, but is not limited to, diffusion, active transport, bath sonication, electroporation, microinjection, lipofection, adsorption, and protoplast fusion. Transfected nucleic acid molecules can be integrated into a yeast chromosome or maintained on extrachromosomal vectors using techniques known to those skilled in the art. Examples of yeast vehicles carrying such nucleic acid molecules are disclosed in detail herein. As discussed above, yeast cytoplast, yeast ghost, and yeast membrane particles or cell wall preparations can also be produced recombinantly by transfecting intact yeast microorganisms or yeast spheroplasts with desired nucleic acid molecules, producing the antigen therein, and then further manipulating the microorganisms or spheroplasts using techniques known to those skilled in the art to produce cytoplast, ghost or subcellular yeast membrane extract or fractions thereof containing desired antigens or other proteins.

In one aspect of the invention, the yeast vehicle is manipulated such that the antigen is expressed or provided by delivery or translocation of an expressed protein product, partially or wholly, on the surface of the yeast vehicle (extracellular expression). One method for accomplishing this aspect of the invention is to use a spacer arm for positioning one or more protein(s) on the surface of the yeast vehicle. For example, one can use a spacer arm to create a fusion protein of the antigen(s) or other protein of interest with a protein that targets the antigen(s) or other protein of interest to the yeast cell wall. For example, one such protein that can be used to target other proteins is a yeast protein (e.g., cell wall protein 2 (cwp2), Aga2, Pir4 or Flo1 protein) that enables the antigen(s) or other protein to be targeted to the yeast cell wall such that the antigen or other protein is located on the surface of the yeast. Proteins other than yeast proteins may be used for the spacer arm; however, for any spacer arm protein, it is most desirable to have the immunogenic response be directed against the target antigen rather than the spacer arm protein. As such, if other proteins are used for the spacer arm, then the spacer arm protein that is used should not generate such a large immune response to the spacer arm protein itself such that the immune response to the target antigen(s) is overwhelmed. One of skill in the art should aim for a small immune response to the spacer arm protein relative to the immune response for the target antigen(s). Spacer arms can be constructed to have cleavage sites (e.g., protease cleavage sites) that allow the antigen to be readily removed or processed away from the yeast, if desired. Any known method of determining the magnitude of immune responses can be used (e.g., antibody production, lytic assays, etc.) and are readily known to one of skill in the art.

Another method for positioning the target antigen(s) or other proteins to be exposed on the yeast surface is to use signal sequences such as glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI) to anchor the target to the yeast cell wall. Alternatively, positioning can be accomplished by appending signal sequences that target the antigen(s) or other proteins of interest into the secretory pathway via translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) such that the antigen binds to a protein which is bound to the cell wall (e.g., cwp).

In one aspect, the spacer arm protein is a yeast protein. The yeast protein can consist of between about two and about 800 amino acids of a yeast protein. In one embodiment, the yeast protein is about 10 to 700 amino acids. In another embodiment, the yeast protein is about 40 to 600 amino acids. Other embodiments of the invention include the yeast protein being at least 250 amino acids, at least 300 amino acids, at least 350 amino acids, at least 400 amino acids, at least 450 amino acids, at least 500 amino acids, at least 550 amino acids, at least 600 amino acids, or at least 650 amino acids. In one embodiment, the yeast protein is at least 450 amino acids in length.

Use of yeast proteins can stabilize the expression of fusion proteins in the yeast vehicle, prevents posttranslational modification of the expressed fusion protein, and/or targets the fusion protein to a particular compartment in the yeast (e.g., to be expressed on the yeast cell surface). For delivery into the yeast secretory pathway, exemplary yeast proteins to use include, but are not limited to: Aga (including, but not limited to, Aga1 and/or Aga2); SUC2 (yeast invertase); alpha factor signal leader sequence; CPY; Cwp2p for its localization and retention in the cell wall; BUD genes for localization at the yeast cell bud during the initial phase of daughter cell formation; Flo1p; Pir2p; and Pir4p.

Other sequences can be used to target, retain and/or stabilize the protein to other parts of the yeast vehicle, for example, in the cytosol or the mitochondria. Examples of suitable yeast protein that can be used for any of the embodiments above include, but are not limited to, SECT; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase PCK1, phosphoglycerokinase PGK and triose phosphate isomerase TPI gene products for their repressible expression in glucose and cytosolic localization; the heat shock proteins SSA1, SSA3, SSA4, SSC1, whose expression is induced and whose proteins are more thermostable upon exposure of cells to heat treatment; the mitochondrial protein CYC1 for import into mitochondria; ACT1.

In one embodiment, control of the amount of yeast glycosylation is used to control the expression of antigens by the yeast, particularly on the surface. The amount of yeast glycosylation can affect the immunogenicity and antigenicity of the antigen expressed on the surface, since sugar moieties tend to be bulky. As such, the existence of sugar moieties on the surface of yeast and its impact on the three-dimensional space around the target antigen(s) should be considered in the modulation of yeast according to the invention. Any method can be used to reduce the amount of glycosylation of the yeast (or increase it, if desired). For example, one could use a yeast mutant strain that has been selected to have low glycosylation (e.g. mnn1, och1 and mnn9 mutants), or one could eliminate by mutation the glycosylation acceptor sequences on the target antigen. Alternatively, one could use a yeast with abbreviated glycosylation patterns, e.g. Pichia. One can also treat the yeast using methods that reduce or alter the glycosylation.

In one embodiment of the present invention, as an alternative to expression of an antigen or other protein recombinantly in the yeast vehicle, a yeast vehicle is loaded intracellularly with the protein or peptide, or with carbohydrates or other molecules that serve as an antigen and/or are useful as immunomodulatory agents or biological response modifiers according to the invention. Subsequently, the yeast vehicle, which now contains the antigen and/or other proteins intracellularly, can be administered to the patient or loaded into a carrier such as a dendritic cell. Peptides and proteins can be inserted directly into yeast vehicles of the present invention by techniques known to those skilled in the art, such as by diffusion, active transport, liposome fusion, electroporation, phagocytosis, freeze-thaw cycles and bath sonication. Yeast vehicles that can be directly loaded with peptides, proteins, carbohydrates, or other molecules include intact yeast, as well as spheroplasts, ghosts or cytoplasts, which can be loaded with antigens and other agents after production. Alternatively, intact yeast can be loaded with the antigen and/or agent, and then spheroplasts, ghosts, cytoplasts, or subcellular particles can be prepared therefrom. Any number of antigens and/or other agents can be loaded into a yeast vehicle in this embodiment, from at least 1, 2, 3, 4 or any whole integer up to hundreds or thousands of antigens and/or other agents, such as would be provided by the loading of a microorganism or portions thereof, for example.

In another embodiment of the present invention, an antigen and/or other agent is physically attached to the yeast vehicle. Physical attachment of the antigen and/or other agent to the yeast vehicle can be accomplished by any method suitable in the art, including covalent and non-covalent association methods which include, but are not limited to, chemically crosslinking the antigen and/or other agent to the outer surface of the yeast vehicle or biologically linking the antigen and/or other agent to the outer surface of the yeast vehicle, such as by using an antibody or other binding partner. Chemical cross-linking can be achieved, for example, by methods including glutaraldehyde linkage, photoaffinity labeling, treatment with carbodiimides, treatment with chemicals capable of linking di-sulfide bonds, and treatment with other cross-linking chemicals standard in the art. Alternatively, a chemical can be contacted with the yeast vehicle that alters the charge of the lipid bilayer of yeast membrane or the composition of the cell wall so that the outer surface of the yeast is more likely to fuse or bind to antigens and/or other agent having particular charge characteristics. Targeting agents such as antibodies, binding peptides, soluble receptors, and other ligands may also be incorporated into an antigen as a fusion protein or otherwise associated with an antigen for binding of the antigen to the yeast vehicle.

In yet another embodiment, the yeast vehicle and the antigen or other protein are associated with each other by a more passive, non-specific or non-covalent binding mechanism, such as by gently mixing the yeast vehicle and the antigen or other protein together in a buffer or other suitable formulation (e.g., admixture).

In one embodiment of the invention, the yeast vehicle and the antigen or other protein are both loaded intracellularly into a carrier such as a dendritic cell or macrophage to form the therapeutic composition or vaccine of the present invention.

In one embodiment, intact yeast (with or without expression of heterologous antigens or other proteins) can be ground up or processed in a manner to produce yeast cell wall preparations, yeast membrane particles or yeast fragments (i.e., not intact) and the yeast fragments can, in some embodiments, be provided with or administered with other compositions that include antigens (e.g., DNA vaccines, protein subunit vaccines, killed or inactivated pathogens) to enhance immune response. For example, enzymatic treatment, chemical treatment or physical force (e.g., mechanical shearing or sonication) can be used to break up the yeast into parts that are used as an adjuvant.

In one embodiment of the invention, yeast vehicles useful in the invention include yeast vehicles that have been killed or inactivated. Killing or inactivating of yeast can be accomplished by any of a variety of suitable methods known in the art. For example, heat inactivation of yeast is a standard way of inactivating yeast, and one of skill in the art can monitor the structural changes of the target antigen, if desired, by standard methods known in the art. Alternatively, other methods of inactivating the yeast can be used, such as chemical, electrical, radioactive or UV methods. See, for example, the methodology disclosed in standard yeast culturing textbooks such as Methods of Enzymology, Vol. 194, Cold Spring Harbor Publishing (1990). Any of the inactivation strategies used should take the secondary, tertiary or quaternary structure of the target antigen into consideration and preserve such structure as to optimize its immunogenicity.

Effective conditions for the production of recombinant yeast vehicles and expression of the antigen and/or other protein (e.g., an agent as described herein) by the yeast vehicle include an effective medium in which a yeast strain can be cultured. An effective medium is typically an aqueous medium comprising assimilable carbohydrate, nitrogen and phosphate sources, as well as appropriate salts, minerals, metals and other nutrients, such as vitamins and growth factors. The medium may comprise complex nutrients or may be a defined minimal medium. Yeast strains of the present invention can be cultured in a variety of containers, including, but not limited to, bioreactors, Erlenmeyer flasks, test tubes, microtiter dishes, and Petri plates. Culturing is carried out at a temperature, pH and oxygen content appropriate for the yeast strain. Such culturing conditions are well within the expertise of one of ordinary skill in the art (see, for example, Guthrie et al. (eds.), 1991, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 194, Academic Press, San Diego).

In some aspects of the invention, the yeast are grown under neutral pH conditions, and particularly, in a media maintained at a pH level of at least 5.5, namely the pH of the culture media is not allowed to drop below pH 5.5. In other aspects, the yeast is grown at a pH level maintained at about 5.5. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the culturing process includes not only the start of the yeast culture but the maintenance of the culture as well. As yeast culturing is known to turn acidic (i.e., lowering the pH) over time, care must be taken to monitor the pH level during the culturing process. This process is described in detail in WO 2008/097863, published 14 Aug. 2008.

Yeast vehicles can be formulated into yeast-based immunotherapy compositions or products of the present invention, including preparations to be administered to a subject directly or first loaded into a carrier, using a number of techniques known to those skilled in the art. For example, yeast vehicles can be dried by lyophilization. Formulations comprising yeast vehicles can also be prepared by packing yeast in a cake or a tablet, such as is done for yeast used in baking or brewing operations. In addition, yeast vehicles can be mixed with a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, such as an isotonic buffer that is tolerated by a host or host cell. Examples of such excipients include water, saline, Ringer's solution, dextrose solution, Hank's solution, and other aqueous physiologically balanced salt solutions. Nonaqueous vehicles, such as fixed oils, sesame oil, ethyl oleate, or triglycerides may also be used. Other useful formulations include suspensions containing viscosity-enhancing agents, such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, sorbitol, glycerol or dextran. Excipients can also contain minor amounts of additives, such as substances that enhance isotonicity and chemical stability. Examples of buffers include phosphate buffer, bicarbonate buffer and Tris buffer, while examples of preservatives include thimerosal, m- or o-cresol, formalin and benzyl alcohol. Standard formulations can either be liquid injectables or solids which can be taken up in a suitable liquid as a suspension or solution for injection. Thus, in a non-liquid formulation, the excipient can comprise, for example, dextrose, human serum albumin, and/or preservatives to which sterile water or saline can be added prior to administration.

Antigens Useful in the Immunotherapy Compositions of the Invention

According to the present invention, the general use herein of the term “antigen” refers: to any portion of a protein (peptide, partial protein, full-length protein), wherein the protein is naturally occurring or synthetically derived, to a cellular composition (whole cell, cell lysate or disrupted cells), to an organism (whole organism, lysate or disrupted cells) or to a carbohydrate, or other molecule, or a portion thereof. An antigen may, in some embodiments, elicit an antigen-specific immune response (e.g., a humoral and/or a cell-mediated immune response) against the same or similar antigens that are encountered by an element of the immune system (e.g., T cells, antibodies). The term “cancer antigen” can be used interchangeably herein with the terms “tumor-specific antigen”, “tumor-associated antigen”, “cancer-associated target” or “tumor-associated target”.

An antigen can be as small as a single epitope, or larger, and can include multiple epitopes. As such, the size of an antigen can be as small as about 5-12 amino acids (e.g., a peptide) and as large as: a partial protein, a full length protein, including a multimer and fusion protein, chimeric protein, or agonist protein or peptide. In addition, antigens can include carbohydrates.

When referring to stimulation of an immune response, the term “immunogen” is a subset of the term “antigen”, and therefore, in some instances, can be used interchangeably with the term “antigen”. An immunogen, as used herein, describes an antigen which elicits a humoral and/or cell-mediated immune response (i.e., is immunogenic), such that administration of the immunogen to an individual mounts an antigen-specific immune response against the same or similar antigens that are encountered by the immune system of the individual.

An “immunogenic domain” of a given antigen can be any portion, fragment or epitope of an antigen (e.g., a peptide fragment or subunit or an antibody epitope or other conformational epitope) that contains at least one epitope that acts as an immunogen when administered to an animal. For example, a single protein can contain multiple different immunogenic domains. Immunogenic domains need not be linear sequences within a protein, such as in the case of a humoral immune response.

An “epitope” is defined herein as a single immunogenic site within a given antigen that is sufficient to elicit an immune response. Those of skill in the art will recognize that T cell epitopes are different in size and composition from B cell epitopes, and that epitopes presented through the Class I MHC pathway differ from epitopes presented through the Class II MHC pathway. Epitopes can be linear sequence or conformational epitopes (conserved binding regions).

Antigens useful in any of the immunotherapy compositions described herein can include any antigen(s) or immunogenic domain(s) thereof against which it is desirable to elicit an immune response, and in particular, include any antigen(s) or immunogenic domain(s) thereof for which a therapeutic immune response against such antigen would be beneficial to an individual. The antigen can include, but is not limited to: a cancer antigen, a viral antigen, an overexpressed mammalian cell surface molecule, a bacterial antigen, a fungal antigen, a protozoan antigen, a helminth antigen, an ectoparasite antigen, a mammalian cell molecule harboring one or more mutated amino acids, a protein normally expressed pre- or neo-natally by mammalian cells, a protein whose expression is induced by insertion of an epidemiologic agent (e.g. virus), a protein whose expression is induced by gene translocation, and a protein whose expression is induced by mutation of regulatory sequences.

In one aspect of the invention, antigens useful in one or more immunotherapy compositions of the invention include any cancer or tumor-associated antigen. In one aspect, the antigen includes an antigen associated with a preneoplastic or hyperplastic state. The antigen may also be associated with, or causative of cancer. Such an antigen may be a tumor-specific antigen, a tumor-associated antigen (TAA) or tissue-specific antigen, an epitope thereof, or an epitope agonist thereof. Cancer antigens include, but are not limited to, antigens from any tumor or cancer, including, but not limited to, melanomas, squamous cell carcinoma, breast cancers, head and neck carcinomas, thyroid carcinomas, soft tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, testicular cancers, prostatic cancers, ovarian cancers, bladder cancers, skin cancers, brain cancers, angiosarcomas, hemangiosarcomas, mast cell tumors, leukemias, lymphomas, primary hepatic cancers, lung cancers, pancreatic cancers, gastrointestinal cancers (including colorectal cancers), renal cell carcinomas, hematopoietic neoplasias and metastatic cancers thereof.

Suitable cancer antigens include but are not limited to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and epitopes thereof such as CAP-1, CAP-1-6D (GenBank Accession No. M29540 or Zaremba et al., 1997, Cancer Research 57:4570-4577), MART-1 (Kawakami et al, J. Exp. Med. 180:347-352, 1994), MAGE-1 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,395), MAGE-3, GAGE (U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,226), GP-100 (Kawakami et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 91:6458-6462, 1992), MUC-1 (e.g., Jerome et al., J. Immunol., 151:1654-1662 (1993)), MUC-2, mutated Ras oncoprotein (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,465,454 and 7,563,447), normal and mutated p53 oncoproteins (Hollstein et al Nucleic Acids Res. 22:3551-3555, 1994), PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen; Israeli et al., Cancer Res. 53:227-230, 1993), tyrosinase (Kwon et al PNAS 84:7473-7477, 1987), TRP-1 (gp75) (Cohen et al Nucleic Acid Res. 18:2807-2808, 1990; U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,839), NY-ESO-1 (Chen et al PNAS 94: 1914-1918, 1997), TRP-2 (Jackson et al., EMBO J, 11:527-535, 1992), TAG72, KSA, CA-125, PSA (prostate specific antigen; Xue et al., The Prostate, 30:73-78 (1997)), HER-2/neu/c-erb/B2, (U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,214), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor; Harris et al., Breast Cancer Res. Treat, 29:1-2 (1994)), hTERT, p73, B-RAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; Sithanandam et al., (1990), Oncogene 5(12):1775-80), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), Myc, von Hippel-Lindau protein (VHL), Rb-1, Rb-2, androgen receptor (AR), Smad4, MDR1 (also known as P-glycoprotein), Flt-3, BRCA-1 (breast cancer 1; U.S. Pat. No. 5,747,282), BRCA-2 (breast cancer 2; U.S. Pat. No. 5,747,282)), Bcr-Abl, pax3-fkhr, ews-fli-1, Brachyury (GenBank Accession Nos. NP_003172.1 or NM_003181.2; Edwards et al., 1996, Genome Res. 6:226-233), HERV-H (human endogenous retrovirus H), HERV-K (human endogenous retrovirus K), TWIST (GenBank Accession Nos. NM_000474 and NP_000465), Mesothelin (Kojima et al., 1995, J. Biol. Chem. 270(37):21984-90; Chang and Pastan, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93(1):136-40), NGEP (New Gene Expressed in Prostate; Bera et al., 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101(9):3059-3064; Cereda et al., 2010, Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 59(1):63-71; GenBank Accession Nos. AAT40139 or AAT40140), modifications of such antigens and tissue specific antigens, splice variants of such antigens, and/or epitope agonists of such antigens. Other cancer antigens are known in the art. Other cancer antigens may also be identified, isolated and cloned by methods known in the art such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,514,506. Cancer antigens may also include one or more growth factors and splice variants of each.

In one aspect of the invention, the cancer antigen is carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a polypeptide comprising or consisting of epitopes thereof such as CAP-1, CAP-1-6D (GenBank Accession No. M29540 or Zaremba et al., 1997, Cancer Research 57:4570-4577), a modified CEA, a splice variant of CEA, an epitope agonist of such CEA proteins, and/or a fusion protein comprising at least one immunogenic domain of CEA or an agonist epitope thereof. In one aspect, the CEA is a modified CEA corresponding to the modified CEA having an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO:46 in U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2007_0048860, published Mar. 1, 2007, which is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:45. In one aspect, the antigen is a modified CEA having an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO:2 herein, which is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO:1.

In one aspect of the invention, the antigen is a mutated Ras oncoprotein. Exemplary Ras oncoproteins have been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,465,454 and 7,563,447. Ras is one example of an oncoprotein in which several mutations are known to occur at particular positions and be associated with the development of one or more types of cancer. Therefore, one can construct fusion proteins that consist of peptides containing a particular residue that is known to be mutated in certain cancers, wherein each domain contains a different mutation at that site in order to cover several or all known mutations at that site. A fusion protein useful in the present invention may have one, two, or multiple domains, wherein each domain consists of a peptide from a particular protein (the same or different proteins), each peptide consisting of at least 4 amino acid residues flanking either side of and including an epitope or mutated amino acid, such as a mutated amino acid that is found in the protein, wherein the mutation is associated with a particular disease (e.g., cancer). For example, with regard to Ras, one may provide one, two, three, or more immunogenic domains comprising at least 4 amino acids on either side of and including position 12, wherein each domain has a different substitution for the glycine that normally occurs in the non-mutated Ras protein (e.g., a substitution of a valine, a cysteine, an arginine, an aspartate, a serine, or an alanine, for the glycine). As another example, one may provide one, two, three, or more immunogenic domains comprising at least 4 amino acids on either side of and including position 13, wherein each domain has a different substitution for the glycine that normally occurs in the non-mutated Ras protein (e.g., a substitution of an aspartate for the glycine). As yet another example, one may provide one, two, three, or more immunogenic domains comprising at least 4 amino acids on either side of and including position 61, wherein each domain has a different substitution for the glutamine that normally occurs in the non-mutated Ras protein (e.g., a substitution of a leucine, an arginine, or a histidine, for the glutamine). In one example, the cancer antigen comprises fragments of at least 5-9 contiguous amino acid residues of a wild-type Ras protein containing amino acid positions 12, 13, 59, 61 or 76 relative to the wild-type Ras protein, wherein the amino acid residues at positions 12, 13, 59, 61 or 76 are mutated with respect to the wild-type Ras protein. In one aspect, the fusion protein construct consists of at least one peptide that is fused in frame with another mutated tumor antigen (e.g., a Ras protein comprising at least one mutation relative to a wild-type Ras protein sequence), wherein the peptide is selected from the group consisting of: (a) a peptide comprising at least from positions 8-16 of wild-type Ras (human or murine K-Ras, N-Ras or H-Ras), wherein the amino acid residue at position 12 with respect to wild-type Ras is mutated as compared to wild-type Ras; (b) a peptide comprising at least from positions 9-17 of wild-type Ras, wherein the amino acid residue at position 13 with respect to wild-type Ras is mutated as compared to wild-type Ras; (c) a peptide comprising at least from positions 55-63 of wild-type Ras, wherein the amino acid residue at position 59 with respect to SEQ ID NO:3 is mutated as compared to wild-type Ras; (d) a peptide comprising at least from positions 57-65 of wild-type Ras, wherein the amino acid residue at position 61 with respect to wild-type Ras is mutated as compared to wild-type Ras; or (e) a peptide comprising at least from positions 72-80 of wild-type Ras, wherein the amino acid residue at position 76 with respect to wild-type Ras is mutated as compared to wild-type Ras. It is noted that these positions are identical among human and mouse K-Ras, N-Ras and H-Ras, since human and mouse sequences are identical in this region of the protein and since K-Ras, H-Ras and N-Ras are identical in this region. In one aspect, the a Ras fusion protein suitable for use as an antigen in the present invention is selected from: SEQ ID NO:4 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:3), SEQ ID NO:6 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:5), SEQ ID NO:8 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:7), and/or SEQ ID NO:10 (encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented herein as SEQ ID NO:9).

In one aspect of the invention, the antigen is human Brachyury. The amino acid sequence for human Brachyury is represented herein by SEQ ID NO:15, which is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO:14.

In another aspect of the invention, antigens useful in one or more immunotherapy compositions of the invention include any antigens associated with a pathogen or a disease or condition caused by or associated with a pathogen. Such antigens include, but are not limited to, viral antigens, fungal antigens, bacterial antigens, helminth antigens, parasitic antigens, ectoparasite antigens, protozoan antigens, or antigens from any other infectious agent.

In one aspect, the antigen is from virus, including, but not limited to, adenoviruses, arena viruses, bunyaviruses, coronaviruses, coxsackie viruses, cytomegaloviruses, Epstein-Ban viruses, flaviviruses, hepadnaviruses, hepatitis viruses, herpes viruses, influenza viruses, lentiviruses, measles viruses, mumps viruses, myxoviruses, orthomyxoviruses, papilloma viruses, papovaviruses, parainfluenza viruses, paramyxoviruses, parvoviruses, picornaviruses, poxviruses, rabies viruses, respiratory syncytial viruses, reoviruses, rhabdoviruses, rubella viruses, togaviruses, and varicella viruses. Other viruses include T-lymphotrophic viruses, such as human T-cell lymphotrophic viruses (HTLVs, such as HTLV-I and HTLV-II), bovine leukemia viruses (BLVS) and feline leukemia viruses (FLVs). The lentiviruses include, but are not limited to, human (HIV, including HIV-1 or HIV-2), simian (SIV), feline (FIV) and canine (CIV) immunodeficiency viruses. In one embodiment, viral antigens include those from non-oncogenic viruses.

In another aspect, the antigen is from an infectious agent from a genus selected from: Aspergillus, Bordatella, Brugia, Candida, Chlamydia, Coccidia, Cryptococcus, Dirofilaria, Escherichia, Francisella, Gonococcus, Histoplasma, Leishmania, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasma, Paramecium, Pertussis, Plasmodium, Pneumococcus, Pneumocystis, Rickettsia, Salmonella, Shigella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Toxoplasma, Vibriocholerae, and Yersinia. In one aspect, the infectious agent is selected from Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax.

In one aspect, the antigen is from a bacterium from a family selected from: Enterobacteriaceae, Micrococcaceae, Vibrionaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Mycoplasmataceae, and Rickettsiaceae. In one aspect, the bacterium is of a genus selected from: Pseudomonas, Bordetella, Mycobacterium, Vibrio, Bacillus, Salmonella, Francisella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Enterococcus, Pasteurella, and Yersinia. In one aspect, the bacterium is from a species selected from: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas mallei, Pseudomonas pseudomallei, Bordetella pertussis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Francisella tularensis, Vibrio cholerae, Bacillus anthracis, Salmonella enteric, Yersinia pestis, Escherichia coli and Bordetella bronchiseptica.

In one aspect, the antigen is from a fungus, such a fungus including, but not limited to, a fungus from Saccharomyces spp., Aspergillus spp., Cryptococcus spp., Coccidioides spp., Neurospora spp., Histoplasma spp., or Blastomyces spp. In one aspect, the fungus is from a species selected from: Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus, A. nidulans, Coccidioides immitis, Coccidioides posadasii or Cryptococcus neoformans. The most common species of Aspergillus causing invasive disease include A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, A. terreus and A. nidulans, and may be found, for example, in patients who have immunosuppression or T-cell or phagocytic impairment. A. fumigatus has been implicated in asthma, aspergillomas and invasive aspergillosis. Coccidioidomycosis, also known as San Joaquin Valley Fever, is a fungal disease caused by Coccidioides immitis, and can lead to acute respiratory infections and chronic pulmonary conditions or dissemination to the meninges, bones, and joints. Cryptococcosis-associated conditions are also targeted by methods of the invention, for example, in a non-immunosuppressed or immunosuppressed subject, such as a subject who is infected with HIV.

In some embodiments, the antigen is a fusion protein. In one aspect of the invention, a fusion protein can include two or more antigens. In one aspect, the fusion protein can include two or more immunogenic domains and/or two or more epitopes of one or more antigens. Any combination of antigens, immunogenic domains thereof, and/or epitopes thereof are contemplated for use in the compositions of the invention. An immunotherapeutic composition containing such antigens, immunogenic domains thereof, and/or epitopes thereof may provide antigen-specific immunization in a broad range of patients. For example, a fusion protein useful in the present invention may have multiple domains (two or more domains), wherein each domain consists of a peptide or polypeptide from a particular protein, the peptide or polypeptide consisting of at least 4 amino acid residues flanking either side of and including a mutated amino acid that is found in the protein, wherein the mutation is associated with a particular disease or condition.

In one embodiment, fusion proteins that are used as a component of the yeast-based immunotherapeutic composition useful in the invention are produced using constructs that are particularly useful for the expression of heterologous antigens in yeast. Typically, the desired antigenic protein(s) or peptide(s) are fused at their amino-terminal end to: (a) a specific synthetic peptide that stabilizes the expression of the fusion protein in the yeast vehicle or prevents posttranslational modification of the expressed fusion protein (such peptides are described in detail, for example, in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004-0156858 A1, published Aug. 12, 2004, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety); (b) at least a portion of an endogenous yeast protein, wherein either fusion partner provides significantly enhanced stability of expression of the protein in the yeast and/or a prevents post-translational modification of the proteins by the yeast cells (such proteins are also described in detail, for example, in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004-0156858 A1, supra); and/or (c) at least a portion of a yeast protein that causes the fusion protein to be expressed on the surface of the yeast (e.g., an Aga protein, as described in detail in WO 2008/019366). In addition, the present invention includes the use of peptides that are fused to the C-terminus of the antigen-encoding construct, particularly for use in the selection and identification of the protein. Such peptides include, but are not limited to, any synthetic or natural peptide, such as a peptide tag (e.g., 6×His) or any other short epitope tag. Peptides attached to the C-terminus of an antigen according to the invention can be used with or without the addition of the N-terminal peptides discussed above.

According to the invention, in one embodiment, the two or more different immunotherapy compositions preferably target the same antigen(s). In this embodiment, the same antigen(s) or immunogenic domain(s) thereof are typically expressed by each of the immunotherapy composition vectors, although the antigen(s) and/or immunogenic domain(s) thereof may be admixed with one or both of the compositions, and/or in the case of the yeast-based immunotherapy composition, the antigen may be attached to the yeast vehicle and/or carried inside the yeast vehicle. In one embodiment, both compositions may target the same antigen(s), although each composition may target a different epitope(s) or immunogenic domain(s) within the same antigen. In one embodiment, each immunotherapy compositions targets a different antigen(s) and/or immunogenic domain and/or epitope thereof. For example, it may be advantageous to target one antigen, such as Ras, using one composition and another cancer antigen that is also expressed in the same or a subset of the same cancers, such as CEA, using the other immunotherapy composition. In another embodiment, a combination of one type of immunotherapy composition is provided, wherein there are at least two different antigen compositions within the same type (e.g., a combination of a yeast-based immunotherapy composition expressing mutated Ras or a fusion protein comprising multiple immunogenic domains of mutated Ras, and a yeast-based immunotherapy composition expressing CEA or a modified CEA as described herein). This combination is administered concurrently with the other type of immunotherapy composition (e.g., a virus-based composition) that expresses the same or different antigen(s). In one aspect of such an embodiment, the various combinations can be mixed or in another aspect, need not be physically mixed, but can rather be administered concurrently such as to the same site or different sites, or within the same administration period. In yet another embodiment, one of the two or more different immunotherapy compositions targets one or more antigens, and the other of the immunotherapy compositions is provided as an adjuvant, without necessarily targeting any antigen (i.e., the composition is used for its non-antigen-specific immunotherapy benefits), or without necessarily targeting the same cancer antigen as the other composition. More particularly, because each of the immunotherapy vectors described herein has been show to contribute vector-specific effects to the efficacy of the composition, in some embodiments, only one vector may be associated with or express the antigen, and the other vector is used concurrently to contribute non-antigen-specific immunotherapy effects.

Methods of Use of the Compositions of the Invention

In the methods of the present invention, two or more immunotherapy compositions as described herein are first administered concurrently to an individual. As used herein with respect to administration of a composition, the term “concurrently” means to administer each of the compositions, and particularly, the first dose of such compositions, essentially at the same time or within the same dosing period, or within a time period during which the initial effects of priming of the immune system by the immunotherapy compositions occur (e.g., within 1-2 days and preferably less). For clarity, concurrent administration does not require administration of all of the compositions at precisely the same moment, but rather, the administration of all compositions should occur within one scheduled dosing of the patient in order to prime the immune system with each of the compositions concurrently (e.g., one composition may be administered first, followed immediately or closely by the administration of the second composition, and so on). In some circumstances, such as when the compositions are administered to the same site, the compositions may be provided in admixture, although even when administered at the same site, sequential administration of each composition during the same dosing period may be preferred. In one aspect, the compositions are administered within the same 1-2 days, and in one aspect, on the same day, and in one aspect, within the same 12 hour period, and in one aspect, within the same 8 hour period, and in one aspect, within the same 4 hour period, and in one aspect, within the same 1, 2 or 3 hour period, and in one aspect, within the same 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 minutes.

In some circumstances, either the first or the second immunotherapy composition is administered more frequently than the other. For example, in one aspect, when the first immunotherapy composition is a virus-based immunotherapy composition, and the second immunotherapy composition is a yeast-based immunotherapy composition, the second immunotherapy composition may be administered more frequently than the first immunotherapy composition. For example, in one aspect, in between concurrent administrations of the first and second immunotherapy composition, the second immunotherapy composition may be administered one, two, three or more additional times. For instance, because the immunization with the virus-based immunotherapy composition results in extended presentation of antigen, it may not be necessary or beneficial to administer this composition on shorter frequencies, whereas yeast-based immunotherapy compositions present discrete bolus' of antigen, and so they can be administered more frequently without fears of inhibiting the immune response. For example, in one aspect, the virus-based immunotherapy composition is administered every 2, 3 or 4 or more weeks, while yeast-based immunotherapy compositions are administered at 1 week intervals, which may be extended to longer intervals (2, 3 or 4 weeks or more) as the total period of therapy increases.

In one embodiment of the invention, the two or more immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently, but to different physical sites in the patient. For example, one composition can be administered to a site on one side of the individual's body and the other composition can be administered to a site on the other side of the individual's body. As another example, one composition can be administered at a site near a particular draining lymph node, and the other composition can be administered at a site near a different draining lymph node. In another embodiment, the two or more different immunotherapy compositions are administered concurrently and to the same or substantially adjacent sites in the patient. A substantially adjacent site is a site that is not precisely the same injection site to which the first composition is administered, but that is in close proximity (is next to or near to) the first injection site. In one embodiment, the two or more different immunotherapy compositions are administered in admixture. In one aspect of the invention, a virus-based immunotherapy composition is administered subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or intratumorally, and a yeast-based composition of the invention is administered subcutaneously.

Some embodiments may include combinations of administration approaches. For example, using the exemplary case of concurrent administration of a yeast-based immunotherapy composition (a first composition) and a virus-based immunotherapy composition (a second composition), one portion of the dose of the yeast-based composition (e.g., one fraction of the total dose of yeast-based composition) may be administered in admixture with or to the same or adjacent site as a portion of or all of the dose of the virus-based immunotherapy composition, and then the remaining portion(s) of the dose of the yeast-based immunotherapy composition are administered to other site(s) in the individual. Similarly, a portion of the dose of the virus-based composition can be administered in admixture with or to the same or adjacent site as a portion of or all of the dose of the yeast-based composition, and then the remaining portion(s) of the virus-based immunotherapy composition are administered to other site(s) in the individual. In one embodiment, within a single dose amount of virus-based and/or yeast-based immunotherapy composition that is to be administered in portions to different sites on the individual, some portions may contain or express the target antigen and others may not (i.e., the others may be empty vectors or encode a costimulatory molecule, cytokine, or other non-antigen agent).

Administration of a vaccine or composition can be systemic, mucosal and/or proximal to the location of the target site (e.g., near a tumor). The preferred routes of administration will be apparent to those of skill in the art, depending on the type of condition to be prevented or treated, the antigen used, and/or the target cell population or tissue. Various acceptable methods of administration include, but are not limited to, intravenous administration, intraperitoneal administration, intramuscular administration, intranodal administration, intracoronary administration, intraarterial administration (e.g., into a carotid artery), subcutaneous administration, transdermal delivery, intratracheal administration, subcutaneous administration, intraarticular administration, intraventricular administration, inhalation (e.g., aerosol), intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, aural, intranasal, oral, pulmonary administration, impregnation of a catheter, and direct injection into a tissue. In one aspect, routes of administration include: intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, intradermal, intranodal, intramuscular, transdermal, inhaled, intranasal, oral, intraocular, intraarticular, intracranial, and intraspinal. Parenteral delivery can include intradermal, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intrapleural, intrapulmonary, intravenous, subcutaneous, atrial catheter and venal catheter routes. Aural delivery can include ear drops, intranasal delivery can include nose drops or intranasal injection, and intraocular delivery can include eye drops. Aerosol (inhalation) delivery can also be performed using methods standard in the art (see, for example, Stribling et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 189:11277-11281, 1992, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Other routes of administration that modulate mucosal immunity are useful in the treatment of viral infections. Such routes include bronchial, intradermal, intramuscular, intranasal, other inhalatory, rectal, subcutaneous, topical, transdermal, vaginal and urethral routes. In one aspect, an immunotherapeutic composition of the invention is administered subcutaneously. Preferred methods of administration include, but are not limited to, intravenous, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, intradermal, intranodal, intramuscular, transdermal or intratumoral. The dose is administered at least once. Subsequent doses may be administered as indicated, and are typically utilized.

More particularly, in one embodiment, the initial concurrent administration of the two or more different immunotherapy compositions of the invention may be followed by subsequent booster doses of one and in one embodiment, both or all, immunotherapy compositions. Booster doses (boosts) may be administered any suitable period apart, and are typically administered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 weeks apart. The booster doses of the two or more immunotherapy compositions may be administered concurrently or separately, as desired, but are most typically administered concurrently, as with the priming dose. As with the priming dose, the method of administration can use any combination of sites and administration strategies as described above for the priming dose, but is not limited to the same administration protocol as for the priming dose. For example, if the priming doses were administered to two different sites (one immunotherapy composition at each site), the boosting doses can be administered to the same two sites, to a single site or adjacent sites, or to two different sites, or using the portioning strategy described above.

In addition, the booster doses need not be formulated in exactly the same way as the priming doses. For example, if the each of the immunotherapy compositions in the priming dose provided an antigen(s) and/or immunogenic domain(s) thereof, in the booster dose, both immunotherapy compositions may again provide the antigen(s) and/or immunogenic domain(s) thereof, or only one of the immunotherapy compositions may provide the antigen(s) and/or immunogenic domain(s) thereof, and the other immunotherapy composition may be an empty vector or provide non-antigen agents (e.g., immunostimulatory molecules or other agents). Other possible modification of the compositions as described herein is also contemplated during the boosting stage, including modifications or changes of the viral vector used (e.g., using vaccinia virus in a priming composition and fowlpox virus in a boosting composition, or vice versa), modifications or changes in a yeast vehicle (e.g., change in yeast strain, change in yeast production method, change in how the yeast provides the antigen, such as expressed versus in admixture), dose amounts, antigens or domains provided by one or more of the compositions, and inclusion or elimination or substitution of immunostimulatory molecules or other agents.

The term “unit dose” as it pertains to the inoculum of a composition of the invention refers to physically discrete units suitable as unitary dosages for mammals, each unit containing a predetermined quantity of immunotherapy composition calculated to produce the desired immunogenic effect in association with the required diluent. The specifications for the novel unit dose of an inoculum of this invention are dictated by and are dependent upon the unique characteristics of the particular immunotherapy composition and the particular immunologic effect to be achieved. In providing an individual with an immunotherapy composition of the present invention, preferably a human, the dosage of administered recombinant vector will vary depending upon such factors as the individual's age, weight, height, sex, general medical condition, previous medical history, disease progression, tumor burden, pathogen burden and the like.

The inoculum is typically prepared as a solution in tolerable (acceptable) diluent such as saline, phosphate-buffered saline or other physiologically tolerable diluent and the like to form an aqueous pharmaceutical composition.

With respect to the recombinant virus-based immunotherapy compositions of the invention, in general, it is desirable to provide the recipient with a dosage of recombinant virus in the range of about 10⁵ to about 10¹⁰ plaque forming units, although a lower or higher dose may be administered, including, but not limited to, 10², 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶, 10⁷, 10⁸, 10⁹ 10¹⁰, 10¹¹ or more plaque forming units. Examples of methods for administering the recombinant viral vector into individuals include, but are not limited to, exposure of tumor cells to the recombinant virus ex vivo, or injection of the recombinant vector into the affected host by intravenous, subcutaneous (S.C.), intradermal (I.D.) or intramuscular (I.M.) administration of the virus. Alternatively the recombinant viral vector or combination of recombinant viral vectors may be administered locally by direct injection into a cancerous lesion or tumor or topical application in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The quantity of recombinant vector carrying the nucleic acid sequence of one or more antigens in combination with nucleic acid sequences encoding multiple costimulatory molecules to be administered is based on the titer of virus particles. A preferred range of the antigen to be administered is 10⁵ to 10¹⁰ virus particles per mammal, preferably a human, although a lower or higher dose may be administered, including, but not limited to, 10², 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶, 10⁷, 10⁸, 10⁹ 10¹⁰, 10¹¹ or more plaque forming units.

With respect to the yeast-based immunotherapy compositions of the invention, in general, a suitable single dose is a dose that is capable of effectively providing a yeast vehicle and an antigen (if included) to a given cell type, tissue, or region of the patient body in an amount effective to elicit an antigen-specific immune response, when administered one or more times over a suitable time period. For example, in one embodiment, a single dose of a yeast vehicle of the present invention is from about 1×10⁵ to about 5×10⁷ yeast cell equivalents per kilogram body weight of the organism being administered the composition. More preferably, a single dose of a yeast vehicle of the present invention is from about 0.1 Y.U. (1×10⁶ cells) to about 100 Y.U. (1×10⁹ cells) per dose (i.e., per organism), including any interim dose, in increments of 0.1×10⁶ cells (i.e., 1.1×10⁶, 1.2×10⁶, 1.3×10⁶ . . . ). Preferred doses include doses between 1 Y.U. and 40 Y.U. and more preferably, between 10 Y.U. and 40 Y.U. In one embodiment, the doses are administered at different sites on the individual but during the same dosing period. For example, a 40 Y.U. dose may be administered via by injecting 10 Y.U. doses to four different sites on the individual during one dosing period.

If the mammal to be immunized is already afflicted with a disease (e.g., cancer or metastatic cancer or a chronic pathogen infection), the vaccine can be administered in conjunction with other therapeutic treatments used to treat the disease (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation therapy, small molecule therapy, cytokine therapy, anti-viral therapy, biological response modifier therapy, surgery, etc.), in addition to the concurrent administration of the different immunotherapy compositions described herein.

The method of use of the immunotherapy compositions of the present invention elicits an immune response in an individual such that the individual is protected from the disease or condition, or from symptoms resulting from the disease or condition. As used herein, the phrase “protected from a disease” refers to preventing a disease, preventing at least one symptom of the disease, delaying onset of a disease, reducing one or more symptoms of the disease, reducing the occurrence of the disease, and/or reducing the severity of the disease. With respect to cancer, concurrent administration of the immunotherapy compositions of the invention preferably results in one or more of: prevention of tumor growth, delay to onset of disease, reduction of tumor burden, reduction of tumor growth, increased survival, improved organ function, and/or improved general health of the individual. With respect to infectious disease and other diseases, concurrent administration of the immunotherapy compositions preferably results in one or more of: prevention of the disease or condition, prevention of infection, delay to onset of disease, increased survival, reduction of pathogen burden (e.g., reduction of viral titer), reduction in at least one symptom resulting from the infection in the individual, reduction of organ or system damage resulting from the infection or disease, and improvement in organ or system function.

In the method of treatment of the present invention, the administration of the immunotherapy compositions of the invention may be either “prophylactic” or “therapeutic”. When provided prophylactically, the immunotherapy compositions of the present invention are provided in advance of any symptom of a disease or condition. The prophylactic administration of the immunotherapy compositions serves to prevent or ameliorate or delay time to onset of any subsequent disease. When provided therapeutically, the immunotherapy compositions are provided at or after the onset of a symptom of disease. The term, “disease” refers to any deviation from the normal health of an animal and includes a state when disease symptoms are present, as well as conditions in which a deviation (e.g., tumor growth, infection, etc.) has occurred, but symptoms are not yet manifested.

In any embodiment of the invention, in addition to administration of the immunotherapy compositions of the invention to an individual, additional exogenous immunomodulators or immunostimulatory molecules, chemotherapeutic drugs, antibiotics, antifungal drugs, antiviral drugs, cancer therapies, cytokines, and other therapeutic agents, therapeutic compositions, or therapeutic protocols, alone or in combination, may be administered, depending on the condition to be treated. Suitable biological response modifiers that may be used in conjunction with the immunotherapy compositions of the invention include, but are not limited to, cytokines, chemokines, hormones, lipidic derivatives, peptides, proteins, polysaccharides, small molecule drugs, antibodies and antigen binding fragments thereof (including, but not limited to, anti-cytokine antibodies, anti-cytokine receptor antibodies, anti-chemokine antibodies), vitamins, polynucleotides, nucleic acid binding moieties, aptamers, and growth modulators. Examples of exogenously added agents and biological response modifiers include, but are not limited to, Flt-3L, cyclophosphamide, cisplatinum, gancyclovir, amphotericin B, 5 fluorouracil, interleukin 2 (IL-2), interleukin 4 (IL-4), IL-6, interleukin 10 (IL-10), interleukin 12 (IL-12), type I interferon (including IFN-α) or agonists or antagonists of type I interferon or a receptor thereof; type II interferon (including IFN-γ) or agonists or antagonists of type II interferon or a receptor thereof; type III interferon (including IFN-λ) or agonists or antagonists of type III interferon or a receptor thereof; tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β); anti-CD40; CD40L; anti-CTLA-4 antibody (e.g., to release anergic T cells); T cell co-stimulators (e.g., anti-CD137, anti-CD28, anti-CD40); alemtuzumab (e.g., CAMPATH®), denileukin diftitox (e.g., ONTAK®); anti-CD4; anti-CD25; anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2; agents that block FOXP3 (e.g., to abrogate the activity/kill CD4+/CD25+ T regulatory cells); Flt3 ligand, imiquimod (ALDARA™), granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF); granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), sargramostim (LEUKINE®); hormones including without limitation prolactin and growth hormone; Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, including but not limited to TLR-2 agonists, TLR-4 agonists, TLR-7 agonists, and TLR-9 agonists; TLR antagonists, including but not limited to TLR-2 antagonists, TLR-4 antagonists, TLR-7 antagonists, and TLR-9 antagonists; anti-inflammatory agents and immunomodulators, including but not limited to, COX-2 inhibitors (e.g., Celecoxib, NSAIDS), glucocorticoids, statins, and thalidomide and analogues thereof including IMID™s (which are structural and functional analogues of thalidomide (e.g., REVLIMID® (lenalidomide), ACTIMID® (pomalidomide)); proinflammatory agents, such as fungal or bacterial components or any proinflammatory cytokine or chemokine; immunotherapeutic vaccines including, but not limited to, virus-based vaccines, bacteria-based vaccines, or antibody-based vaccines; and any other immunomodulators, immunopotentiators, anti-inflammatory agents, and/or pro-inflammatory agents.

These exogenous agents and therapies may be administered concurrently with the immunotherapy compositions of the invention, or at different time points. For example, when given to an individual in conjunction with chemotherapy, it may be desirable to administer the immunotherapy compositions during the “holiday” between chemotherapeutic doses, in order to maximize the efficacy of the immunotherapy compositions.

Compositions and therapeutic vaccines of the invention can further include any other compounds that are useful for protecting a subject from a particular disease or condition, including an infection by a pathogen, any compounds that treat or ameliorate any symptom of such an infection, and any compounds or treatments for cancer.

In the method of the present invention, compositions and therapeutic compositions can be administered to animal, including any vertebrate, and particularly to any member of the Vertebrate class, Mammalia, including, without limitation, primates, rodents, livestock and domestic pets. Livestock include mammals to be consumed or that produce useful products (e.g., sheep for wool production). Mammals to protect include humans, dogs, cats, mice, rats, goats, sheep, cattle, horses and pigs.

General Techniques Useful in the Invention

The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional techniques of molecular biology (including recombinant techniques), microbiology, cell biology, biochemistry, nucleic acid chemistry, and immunology, which are well known to those skilled in the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature, such as, Methods of Enzymology, Vol. 194, Guthrie et al., eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1990); Biology and activities of yeasts, Skinner, et al., eds., Academic Press (1980); Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual, Rose et al., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1990); The Yeast Saccharomyces: Cell Cycle and Cell Biology, Pringle et al., eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1997); The Yeast Saccharomyces: Gene Expression, Jones et al., eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1993); The Yeast Saccharomyces: Genome Dynamics, Protein Synthesis, and Energetics, Broach et al., eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1992); Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, second edition (Sambrook et al., 1989) and Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, third edition (Sambrook and Russel, 2001), (jointly referred to herein as “Sambrook”); Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (F. M. Ausubel et al., eds., 1987, including supplements through 2001); PCR: The Polymerase Chain Reaction, (Mullis et al., eds., 1994); Harlow and Lane (1988) Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Publications, New York; Harlow and Lane (1999) Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (jointly referred to herein as “Harlow and Lane”), Beaucage et al. eds., Current Protocols in Nucleic Acid Chemistry John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2000); Casarett and Doull's Toxicology The Basic Science of Poisons, C. Klaassen, ed., 6th edition (2001), and Vaccines, S. Plotkin and W. Orenstein, eds., 3rd edition (1999).

General Definitions

An “immunotherapeutic composition” is a composition that elicits an immune response sufficient to achieve at least one therapeutic benefit in a subject.

In general, the term “biologically active” indicates that a compound has at least one detectable activity that has an effect on the metabolic or other processes of a cell or organism, as measured or observed in vivo (i.e., in a natural physiological environment) or in vitro (i.e., under laboratory conditions). Accordingly, a biologically active portion or fragment or domain of a protein, for example, refers to a portion, fragment or domain that is of sufficient size to have a biological activity of the full-length protein. Such activity is an activity that is particular to that protein, rather than an activity of all proteins as a class.

An “individual” or a “subject” or a “patient”, which terms may be used interchangeably, is a vertebrate, preferably a mammal, more preferably a human. Mammals include, but are not limited to, farm animals, sport animals, pets, primates, mice and rats.

According to the present invention, the term “modulate” can be used interchangeably with “regulate” and refers generally to upregulation or downregulation of a particular activity. As used herein, the term “upregulate” can be used generally to describe any of: elicitation, initiation, increasing, augmenting, boosting, improving, enhancing, amplifying, promoting, or providing, with respect to a particular activity. Similarly, the term “downregulate” can be used generally to describe any of: decreasing, reducing, inhibiting, ameliorating, diminishing, lessening, blocking, or preventing, with respect to a particular activity.

Reference to an isolated protein or polypeptide in the present invention includes full-length proteins, fusion proteins, or any fragment, domain, conformational epitope, or homologue of such proteins. More specifically, an isolated protein, according to the present invention, is a protein (including a polypeptide or peptide) that has been removed from its natural milieu (i.e., that has been subject to human manipulation) and can include purified proteins, partially purified proteins, recombinantly produced proteins, and synthetically produced proteins, for example. As such, “isolated” does not reflect the extent to which the protein has been purified. Preferably, an isolated protein of the present invention is produced recombinantly. According to the present invention, the terms “modification” and “mutation” can be used interchangeably, particularly with regard to the modifications/mutations to the amino acid sequence of proteins or portions thereof (or nucleic acid sequences) described herein.

As used herein, the term “homologue” is used to refer to a protein or peptide which differs from a naturally occurring protein or peptide (i.e., the “prototype” or “wild-type” protein) by minor modifications to the naturally occurring protein or peptide, but which maintains the basic protein and side chain structure of the naturally occurring form. Such changes include, but are not limited to: changes in one or a few amino acid side chains; changes one or a few amino acids, including deletions (e.g., a truncated version of the protein or peptide) insertions and/or substitutions; changes in stereochemistry of one or a few atoms; and/or minor derivatizations, including but not limited to: methylation, glycosylation, phosphorylation, acetylation, myristoylation, prenylation, palmitation, amidation and/or addition of glycosylphosphatidyl inositol. A homologue can have enhanced, decreased, or substantially similar properties as compared to the naturally occurring protein or peptide. A homologue can include an agonist of a protein or an antagonist of a protein. Homologues can be produced using techniques known in the art for the production of proteins including, but not limited to, direct modifications to the isolated, naturally occurring protein, direct protein synthesis, or modifications to the nucleic acid sequence encoding the protein using, for example, classic or recombinant DNA techniques to effect random or targeted mutagenesis.

A homologue of a given protein may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of, an amino acid sequence that is at least about 45%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 55%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 65%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 75%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 85%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95% identical, or at least about 95% identical, or at least about 96% identical, or at least about 97% identical, or at least about 98% identical, or at least about 99% identical (or any percent identity between 45% and 99%, in whole integer increments), to the amino acid sequence of the reference protein. In one embodiment, the homologue comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of, an amino acid sequence that is less than 100% identical, less than about 99% identical, less than about 98% identical, less than about 97% identical, less than about 96% identical, less than about 95% identical, and so on, in increments of 1%, to less than about 70% identical to the naturally occurring amino acid sequence of the reference protein.

As used herein, unless otherwise specified, reference to a percent (%) identity refers to an evaluation of homology which is performed using: (1) a BLAST 2.0 Basic BLAST homology search using blastp for amino acid searches and blastn for nucleic acid searches with standard default parameters, wherein the query sequence is filtered for low complexity regions by default (described in Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schääffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. & Lipman, D. J. (1997) “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.” Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety); (2) a BLAST 2 alignment (using the parameters described below); (3) and/or PSI-BLAST with the standard default parameters (Position-Specific Iterated BLAST. It is noted that due to some differences in the standard parameters between BLAST 2.0 Basic BLAST and BLAST 2, two specific sequences might be recognized as having significant homology using the BLAST 2 program, whereas a search performed in BLAST 2.0 Basic BLAST using one of the sequences as the query sequence may not identify the second sequence in the top matches. In addition, PSI-BLAST provides an automated, easy-to-use version of a “profile” search, which is a sensitive way to look for sequence homologues. The program first performs a gapped BLAST database search. The PSI-BLAST program uses the information from any significant alignments returned to construct a position-specific score matrix, which replaces the query sequence for the next round of database searching. Therefore, it is to be understood that percent identity can be determined by using any one of these programs.

Two specific sequences can be aligned to one another using BLAST 2 sequence as described in Tatusova and Madden, (1999), “Blast 2 sequences—a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences”, FEMS Microbiol Lett. 174:247-250, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. BLAST 2 sequence alignment is performed in blastp or blastn using the BLAST 2.0 algorithm to perform a Gapped BLAST search (BLAST 2.0) between the two sequences allowing for the introduction of gaps (deletions and insertions) in the resulting alignment. For purposes of clarity herein, a BLAST 2 sequence alignment is performed using the standard default parameters as follows.

For blastn, using 0 BLOSUM62 matrix:

Reward for match=1

Penalty for mismatch=−2

Open gap (5) and extension gap (2) penalties

gap x_dropoff (50) expect (10) word size (11) filter (on)

For blastp, using 0 BLOSUM62 matrix:

Open gap (11) and extension gap (1) penalties

gap x_dropoff (50) expect (10) word size (3) filter (on).

As used herein, an “agonist” is any compound or agent, including without limitation small molecules, proteins, peptides, antibodies, nucleic acid binding agents, etc., that binds to a receptor or ligand or interacts with another molecule or within a chemical or biological system and produces or triggers a response, which may include agents that mimic the action of a naturally occurring substance (e.g., an agonist of a protein or peptide). An “antagonist” is any compound or agent, including without limitation small molecules, proteins, peptides, antibodies, nucleic acid binding agents, etc., that blocks or inhibits or reduces the action of an agonist or a naturally occurring substance.

An isolated nucleic acid molecule is a nucleic acid molecule that has been removed from its natural milieu (i.e., that has been subject to human manipulation), its natural milieu being the genome or chromosome in which the nucleic acid molecule is found in nature. As such, “isolated” does not necessarily reflect the extent to which the nucleic acid molecule has been purified, but indicates that the molecule does not include an entire genome or an entire chromosome in which the nucleic acid molecule is found in nature. An isolated nucleic acid molecule can include a gene. An isolated nucleic acid molecule that includes a gene is not a fragment of a chromosome that includes such gene, but rather includes the coding region and regulatory regions associated with the gene, but no additional genes that are naturally found on the same chromosome. An isolated nucleic acid molecule can also include a specified nucleic acid sequence flanked by (i.e., at the 5′ and/or the 3′ end of the sequence) additional nucleic acids that do not normally flank the specified nucleic acid sequence in nature (i.e., heterologous sequences). Isolated nucleic acid molecule can include DNA, RNA (e.g., mRNA), or derivatives of either DNA or RNA (e.g., cDNA). Although the phrase “nucleic acid molecule” primarily refers to the physical nucleic acid molecule and the phrase “nucleic acid sequence” primarily refers to the sequence of nucleotides on the nucleic acid molecule, the two phrases can be used interchangeably, especially with respect to a nucleic acid molecule, or a nucleic acid sequence, being capable of encoding a protein or domain of a protein. The term “polynucleotide” can also be used interchangeably with the terms “nucleic acid molecule” or “nucleic acid sequence”.

A recombinant nucleic acid molecule is a molecule that can include at least one of any nucleic acid sequence encoding any one or more proteins described herein operatively linked to at least one of any transcription control sequence capable of effectively regulating expression of the nucleic acid molecule(s) in the cell to be transfected. Although the phrase “nucleic acid molecule” primarily refers to the physical nucleic acid molecule and the phrase “nucleic acid sequence” primarily refers to the sequence of nucleotides on the nucleic acid molecule, the two phrases can be used interchangeably, especially with respect to a nucleic acid molecule, or a nucleic acid sequence, being capable of encoding a protein. In addition, the phrase “recombinant molecule” primarily refers to a nucleic acid molecule operatively linked to a transcription control sequence, but can be used interchangeably with the phrase “nucleic acid molecule” which is administered to an animal.

A recombinant nucleic acid molecule includes a recombinant vector, which is any nucleic acid sequence, typically a heterologous sequence, which is operatively linked to the isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a fusion protein of the present invention, which is capable of enabling recombinant production of the fusion protein, and which is capable of delivering the nucleic acid molecule into a host cell according to the present invention. Such a vector can contain nucleic acid sequences that are not naturally found adjacent to the isolated nucleic acid molecules to be inserted into the vector. The vector can be either RNA or DNA, either prokaryotic or eukaryotic, and preferably in the present invention, is a virus or a plasmid. Recombinant vectors can be used in the cloning, sequencing, and/or otherwise manipulating of nucleic acid molecules, and can be used in delivery of such molecules (e.g., as in a DNA composition or a viral vector-based composition). Recombinant vectors are preferably used in the expression of nucleic acid molecules, and can also be referred to as expression vectors. Preferred recombinant vectors are capable of being expressed in a transfected host cell.

In a recombinant molecule of the present invention, nucleic acid molecules are operatively linked to expression vectors containing regulatory sequences such as transcription control sequences, translation control sequences, origins of replication, and other regulatory sequences that are compatible with the host cell and that control the expression of nucleic acid molecules of the present invention. In particular, recombinant molecules of the present invention include nucleic acid molecules that are operatively linked to one or more expression control sequences. The phrase “operatively linked” refers to linking a nucleic acid molecule to an expression control sequence in a manner such that the molecule is expressed when transfected (i.e., transformed, transduced or transfected) into a host cell.

According to the present invention, the term “transfection” is used to refer to any method by which an exogenous nucleic acid molecule (i.e., a recombinant nucleic acid molecule) can be inserted into a cell. The term “transformation” can be used interchangeably with the term “transfection” when such term is used to refer to the introduction of nucleic acid molecules into microbial cells, such as algae, bacteria and yeast. In microbial systems, the term “transformation” is used to describe an inherited change due to the acquisition of exogenous nucleic acids by the microorganism and is essentially synonymous with the term “transfection.” Therefore, transfection techniques include, but are not limited to, transformation, chemical treatment of cells, particle bombardment, electroporation, microinjection, lipofection, adsorption, infection and protoplast fusion.

The following experimental results are provided for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

EXAMPLES

The following Materials and Methods were used in the Examples below.

Mice and Tumor Cell Lines

For in vitro stimulation of lymphocytes, female C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Facility (Frederick, Md.). A breeding pair of C57BL/6 mice homozygous for expression of the human CEA gene (CEA-Tg) was generously provided by Dr. John Shively (City of Hope, Duarte, Calif.). Homozygosity for CEA expression was confirmed by PCR analysis of mouse-tail DNA (Greiner et al., Cancer Res 2002 Dec. 1; 62(23):6944-51). Six- to 8-week-old female mice were used for all experiments, and were housed in micro-isolator cages under pathogen-free conditions in accordance with AAALAC guidelines. Experimental studies were carried out under approval of the NIH Intramural Animal Care and Use Committee. The target tumor cell line EL-4 (H-2b, thymoma) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). LL/2 6 murine lung adenocarcinoma tumor cells were the gift of Dr. Chandan Guha (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y.). LL/2 murine lung carcinoma cells expressing human CEA (LL2-CEA) were generated by retroviral transduction with CEA cDNA, as previously described (Robbins et al., Cancer Res 1991 Jul. 15; 51(14):3657-62). Cells were maintained in complete medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin).

Vaccine Constructs

Recombinant vaccinia (rV) and recombinant fowlpox (rF) viruses containing murine B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3 genes as well as the human CEA gene (rV/F-CEA/TRICOM) have been previously described (Hodge et al., Cancer Res 1999 Nov. 15; 59(22):5800-7; and Grosenbach et al., Cancer Res 2001 Jun. 1; 61(11):4497-505). The murine GM-CSF-expressing rF virus (rFGM-CSF) has been previously described (Kass et al., Cancer Res 2001 Jan. 1; 61(1):206-14). A recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae construct expressing the full-length CEA protein (yeast-CEA) has been previously described (Bernstein et al., Vaccine 2008 Jan. 24; 26(4):509-21). Yeast-CEA was produced and heat-killed for these studies as previously described (Haller et al., Vaccine 2007 Feb. 9; 25(8):1452-63).

Vaccination Schedules

For serum cytokine analysis, CEA-Tg mice (n=2) were vaccinated with 1×10⁸ pfu rVCEA/TRICOM or 4 YU/animal (1 YU=10⁷ yeast particles) of yeast-CEA as previously described (Wansley et al., Clin Cancer Res 2008 Jul. 1; 14(13):4316-25). For all other studies, the rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccine group, CEA-Tg mice were primed with 1×10⁸ pfu rV-CEA/TRICOM admixed with 1×10⁷ pfu rF-GM-CSF on day 0, and boosted every 7 days with 1×10⁸ pfu rF-CEA/TRICOM admixed with 1×10⁷ pfu rF-GM-CSF. For the remainder of the Examples and elsewhere according to this invention, this vaccine protocol will be generally designated as “rV/F-CEA/TRICOM”. In the yeast-CEA vaccine group, CEA-Tg mice were vaccinated every 7 days with yeast-CEA (4 YU/mouse). Mice receiving the combination of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA vaccines were primed with 1×10⁸ pfu rV-CEA/TRICOM, administered subcutaneously on the dorsal right flank, and with 4 YU/mouse of yeast-CEA, delivered subcutaneously on the inner legs and shoulder blades. The separation of the yeast-CEA dose over multiple sites has previously been described (Wansley, 2008, supra), and has been employed here to separate not only the yeast-CEA vaccine, but also the rV/F-CEA/TRICOM to target multiple draining lymph nodes in the mouse. Mice in the combination group were boosted at 1-week intervals for the remainder of the study with 1×10⁸ pfu rF-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA (4 YU/mouse).

Cytokine Expression Profiles

For serum cytokine analysis, vaccinated mice (see vaccination schedule above) were bled on days 0, 2, and 4 post-vaccination and serum was isolated. Cytokine expression was analyzed using a Th1/Th2 and proinflammatory cytokine panel by Linco Diagnostic Services (St. Charles, Mo.). To measure cytokines secreted by CD8+ T-cells from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA (n=5), CD8+ T-cells were bulk cultured and restimulated in the presence of CEA-572-579 peptide (GIQNSVSA, designated CEA-572 and represented herein by SEQ ID NO:11) or CEA-526-533 peptide (EAQNTTYL, designated CEA-526 and represented herein by SEQ ID NO:12) (10 μg/ml) as previously described (Wansley et al., 2008, supra). Cytokine levels were measured using the mouse Inflammatory Cytokine Cytometric Bead Array Kit and the mouse Th1/Th2 Cytokine Cytometric Bead Array kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

T-Cell Receptor (TCR) Profiles

RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was then used in RT-PCR reactions using the Invitrogen SUPERSCRIPT® First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, 8 Carlsbad, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Vα and Vβ genes were amplified using primers and conditions previously described for 19 Vα and 24 Vβ genes (Pannetier et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993 May 1; 90(9):4319-23; Arden et al., Nature 1985 Aug. 29-Sep. 4; 316(6031):783-7). PCR products were analyzed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and Agilent DNA 1000 Reagent Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Calif.) by on-chip electrophoresis according to the manufacturer's instructions. Agilent 2100 Expert Software (version B.02.06SI418 [Patch 01]) was used to identify PCR products by size (bp) and quantity (nmol/L). For each sample, quantities of each gene present were summed, and for each gene, a percent of the total TCR Vα or Vβ repertoire was calculated.

A mouse Vβ TCR screening panel (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, Calif.) consisting of monoclonal antibodies specific for mouse TCR Vβ 2, 3, 4, 5.1 and 5.2, 6, 7, 8.1 and 8.2, 8.3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 17 were used to identify TCR Vβ expression at the protein level by flow cytometry using a FACScan cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

cDNA Oligoarray

CEA-Tg mice were either untreated or vaccinated 3 times at 1-week intervals with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA. On day 33, splenocytes were harvested and RNA was isolated. T- and B-cell activation, chemokines and chemokine receptors, and common cytokines cDNA oligoarrays (SABiosciences, Frederick, Md.) were used to investigate changes in gene expression. Genes were considered up-regulated or down-regulated if their normalized intensity ratio was >2 or <0.5 (a 2-fold cutoff), respectively, according to manufacturer's recommendations.

CEA-Specific CTL Cell Lines and In Vitro Assays

CEA-526-specific and CEA-572-specific T-cell lines generated from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA were maintained in culture with CEA-526 or CEA-572 peptide (1 μg/ml) and IL-2 (10 U/ml) with fresh irradiated APCs. To measure the ability of the T-cell lines to lyse ¹¹¹In-labeled targets, various ratios of T cells were incubated with labeled targets in triplicate at 37° C. and 5% CO₂ in 96-well U-bottom plates. In certain studies, anti-MHC class I blocking antibody (H2D^(b), BD Pharmingen) was used to distinguish between TCR-mediated and NK-like cytotoxicities. Radioactivity in supernatants was measured using a gammacounter (Corba Autogamma, Packard Instruments, Downers Grove, Ill.). Percentage of tumor lysis was calculated as follows: % tumor lysis=[(experimental cpm−spontaneous cpm)/(maximum cpm−spontaneous cpm)]×100. To evaluate the avidity of CEA-specific CTL lines, tumor-killing activity was tested as previously described (Hodge et al, 2005, J Immunol 174(10):5994-6004). Data were averaged and graphed as A % specific lysis. To normalize groups within each experiment, data were also expressed as percentage of maximum lysis versus peptide concentration. Finally, the natural logarithm of the normalized data was plotted against peptide concentration. The avidity of each T-cell population was defined as the negative log of the peptide concentration that resulted in 50% maximal target lysis (Hodge et al., 2005, supra and Derby et al, 2001, J Immunol 166(3):1690-1697) and was expressed in nM. The HIV-gag-390-398 peptide (SQVTNPANI, designated HIV-gag peptide and represented herein by SEQ ID NO:13 was used as a negative control in this experiment. MHC class I-peptide tetramers specific for CEA-526 and CEA-572 were obtained from Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, Calif.). Where indicated, CTL activity was converted to lytic units (LU), as described by Wunderlich et al. (1994, “Induction and measurement of cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity.” In: Coligan J, Kruisbeek A, Margulies D, Shevach E, Strober W (eds) Current Protocols in Immunology, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J.).

Tumor Therapy Studies

For therapy studies involving LL2-CEA tumors, 6- to 8-week-old female CEA-Tg mice were injected i.v. in the tail with 3×10⁵ LL2-CEA cells in a volume of 100 μl. Four days post-tumor implantation, mice were primed and then boosted as described above. To enumerate lung metastases, lungs from sacrificed mice were inflated, stained with India ink, and fixed in Fekete's solution (Wexler, J Natl Cancer Inst 1966 April; 36(4):641-5).

Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism version 4.0a for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.) was used to perform statistical analyses on in vivo data. A 2-tailed, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was performed for the average number of tumors per mouse at day 45. A log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was performed for mice bearing >10 pulmonary tumor nodules at day 45 which were deemed to have ≤1 week to live. All values were calculated at a 95% confidence interval and a p value ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Example 1

The following example shows the role of the immunotherapy vector in inducing cytokine and chemokine host innate immune responses that may subsequently influence CEA-specific T-cell responses.

In this experiment, the role of the immunotherapy vector in inducing cytokine and chemokine host innate immune responses that may subsequently influence CEA-specific T-cell responses was investigated. Briefly, CEA-Tg mice (n=2) were vaccinated with rV-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA. Serum was collected at 0, 2, and 4 days, pooled and analyzed for a panel of cytokines using a Th1/Th2 and pro-inflammatory cytokine panel. As shown in FIG. 1, rV-CEA/TRICOM (closed squares) induces a Th1-type cytokine profile, where MIP1α, RANTES, GM-CSF, and IL-12p70 levels are high and IL-5 levels are low (FIGS. 1A, B, C, and E, respectively). In contrast, yeast-CEA vaccination induces a mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine profile with increased levels of IL-6 (FIG. 1D), low levels of MIP1α, RANTES, IL-13, and IL-5 (FIGS. 1A, B, F, and I, respectively). Data are presented as pg/ml of cytokine on each day. These data show that vaccination with rV-CEA/TRICOM vs. yeast-CEA induces expression of different cytokines, indicating that different T-cell populations are induced by each of the vaccine platforms.

Example 2

The following example demonstrates that vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vs. yeast-CEA induces distinct TCR repertoires.

This experiment sought to determine whether vaccination with either platform induces CD8+ T-cell populations with distinct TCR repertoires. CEA-Tg mice (n=5 per group) were vaccinated with either rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA as described in the Materials and Methods section above. Untreated mice served as a negative control (FIGS. 2A and 2D). Spleens from vaccinated mice were harvested 14 days post vaccination and pooled. RT-PCR reactions were performed using 19 Vα-specific and 24 Vβ-specific primers. PCR products were then analyzed and the percentage of the total TCR repertoire was calculated for each gene (FIG. 2; Astericks indicate genes that are uniquely expressed in T-cells from mice vaccinated with one vaccine compared to the other). The TCR Vα profiles of splenocytes from untreated mice and mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA indicate that each group has a distinct TCR Vα expression profile (FIGS. 2A to C). The expression of 12 of the 19 Vα genes was similar between T-cells induced by both vaccines, while 7 Vα genes are unique to T-cell populations from one vaccine compared to the other (FIGS. 2B and C). Comparison of the Vβ repertoires from these same animals indicated that, with a few exceptions, the Vβ profiles also differ among the two groups of mice (FIGS. 2D to E). The expression of 14 of the 24 Vβ genes was similar between T-cells induced by both vaccines, yet the vaccines induce unique Vβ genes as well. As shown in FIGS. 2E and F, 10 Vβ genes were uniquely expressed by T-cells from either rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA-vaccinated CEA-Tg mice (Vβ1, Vβ4, Vβ5.1, Vβ5.2, Vβ5.3, Vβ8.1, Vβ8.3, Vβ9, Vβ10, and Vβ20). These data indicate that the Vα and Vβ TCR repertoires of T-cells from untreated mice and mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA have both shared and unique patterns of TCR gene expression. It is unknown, however, if these differences are due to different processing and presentation of the CEA antigen by the different vector-infected cells, or to the vectors themselves. The TCR repertoires of T-cell lines specific for two different CEA epitopes created from CEA-Tg mice vaccinated with the two vector platforms are described in the examples below.

Example 3

The following example shows that vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA induces both shared and unique gene expression in response to vector and antigen.

To investigate the effects of both vector and antigen on the gene expression of splenocytes, cDNA oligoarrays were used to further characterize the T-cell populations induced by vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA. The expression of 252 genes involved in T- and B-cell activation, chemokines, chemokine receptors, and cytokines by splenocytes of CEA-Tg mice vaccinated with rV/FCEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA was investigated. Table 1 shows that for each array, both rV/FCEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA induce changes in expression of the same genes, including up-regulation of 26 genes by at least 2-fold, the majority of which are involved in cytokine signaling. In addition, both vaccines up-regulated Ltb4r2, a leukotriene receptor involved in chemotaxis of immune cells, genes involved in T-cell proliferation, such as secreted phosphoprotein-1 (Spp1, or osteopontin), and the tumor suppressor Inha. At the same time, each vaccine platform induces unique changes in expression of several genes (Table 1, bold). Yeast-CEA down-regulates genes involved in chemotaxis of immune cells such as Ccl12, Cxcl9, Ccr9, while rV/F-CEA/TRICOM does not alter the expression of any of the these genes. The results from this experiment indicate that the two vaccine platforms induce changes in gene expression that are both shared and unique.

TABLE 1 Genes Involved in T-cell Chemokines and Vaccination and B-cell Activation Chemokine Receptors Cytokines rV/F-CEA/TRICOM/No treatment Genes up- H60, Igbp1b, Il11, Il4 Inha (3.03), Ltb4r2, Il17c, Il17f, Inhba regulated >2-fold Bmp10, Bmp5 Fgf10, Gdf2, Gdf5, Gdf8, Ifna2, Ifna4, IfnbI, Il13, Il17b, Il25, Il19, Ilf10, Ilf5, Ilf6, Ilf8, Il20, Il3, Il9 Genes down- Ms4al, Sppl (4.00) Il1rn (4.29) regulated >2-fold Yeast-CEA/No treatment Genes up- Rag1 (3.48) Bdnf, Ccl20, Cmtm2a, GdX regulated >2-fold H60 (3.25), Igbp1b (3.25), Cmtm5, Cxcl15, Gdf5, Fgf10, Gdf2, Gdf5, Gdf8, Il11 (3.25), Il4 Ccl17 Ifna2, Ifna4, IfnbI, Il13, Inha (4.92), Ltb4r2 (4.92), Il17b, Il25, Il19, Ilf10, Ilf5, Bmp10, Bmp5 Ilf6, Ilf8, Il20, Il3, Il9 Genes down- Tnfrsf13c (6.06) Ccl12 (3.03), Cc18 (3.73) Gdf3(4.0), Il10, Csf-2, regulated >2-fold Ms4al (3.25), Spp1 Ccr9, Ccrl2, Csf2, Cx3crl, Fasl, Tnf, Tnfrsf11b, Cxcl10, Cxcl13, Hif1a, Tnfsfl5 Inhbb, Lif (3.48), Gusb, Cxcl9 (4.92) Genes in bold are up-regulated/down-regulated specifically by splenocytes from mice vaccinated with either rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA, but not by both. Fold changes >3-fold are noted in parentheses

Example 4

The following example demonstrates that rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA induce functionally distinct T-cell populations.

To determine the antigen-specific response of T-cell populations induced by the vaccines, the cytokines produced by T-cells from vaccinated animals after in vitro stimulation with either of two discrete CEA epitopes (CEA-572 and CEA-526) were investigated. FIG. 3A illustrates CEA protein showing the discrete, non-overlapping CEA-526 and CEA-572 epitopes on the A3 loop of domain III.

Referring to FIG. 3, CEA-Tg mice (n=5) were primed with rV-CEA/TRICOM (solid bars) on day 0 and boosted on days 7 and 14 with rFCEA/TRICOM; CEA-Tg mice (n=5) were primed on day 0 and boosted on days 7 and 14 with yeast-CEA (open bars). On day 33, mice were sacrificed and spleens pooled and put into bulk cultures with either (FIG. 3B) CEA-526 or (FIG. 3C) CEA-572 peptide for 7 days. IL-2, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-5 and IL-4 were measured by cytokine bead array (pg/ml/L×10⁶ cells) after lymphocytes were restimulated for 24 hours with CEA-specific peptide or VSVN peptide control. All data have been normalized to the VSVN peptide control.

It was observed that the two different CEA epitopes induce different levels of cytokine production from T cells from vaccinated animals. Higher levels of TNF-α are secreted in response to CEA-526 after rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccination compared to yeast-CEA (FIG. 3B, closed bar), yet yeast-CEA vaccination produces significantly higher levels of TNF-α when T cells are stimulated with CEA-572 peptide (FIG. 3C, open bar). Also, T cells from yeast-CEA vaccination induce higher levels of IL-2 compared to T cells from rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccination, when stimulated with the CEA-526 and CEA-572 peptides (FIGS. 3B and 3C, open bars). Similarly, after vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM, T cells induce higher levels of IFN-γ compared to yeast-CEA vaccination in response to the CEA-526 and CEA-572 peptides (FIGS. 3B and 3C, closed bars).

The data also show that T-cells from vaccinated animals secrete different levels of various cytokines in response to a single CEA epitope. T-cells from mice vaccinated with yeast-CEA secrete IL-4, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-5, and IL-2 in response to the CEA-572 epitope (FIG. 3C, open bars). On the other hand, T-cells from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM secrete significantly higher levels of IFN-γ compared to yeast-CEA in response to the CEA-572 peptide and lower levels of IL-10 and TNF-α in response to the CEA-572 epitope (FIG. 3C, closed bars). These results indicate that the T-cell populations induced by vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA are antigen-specific and functionally distinct.

Example 5

The following example demonstrates that T-cell lines developed from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM versus yeast-CEA have 14 distinct TCR repertoires and functional avidity.

To further explore potential differences in the functionality of T cells from mice vaccinated with either rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA, T-cell lines specific for either CEA-526 or CEA-572 peptide were created from vaccinated CEA-Tg mice as described in the Materials and Methods. Briefly, CEA-Tg mice (n=5 per group) vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA as described above. Two weeks after the final vaccination, spleens were harvested and pooled, and splenocytes were bulk cultured with CEA-526 or CEA-572 peptide for 7 days. Lymphocytes were restimulated with fresh peptide, IL-2, and irradiated APCs every 7 days and kept in culture for in vitro experiments. TCR profile analysis was conducted after 18 stimulation cycles.

Vα TCR profiles from the 4 cell lines indicate that the T-cell populations have shared and distinct Vα TCR repertoires. Referring to FIG. 4, Vα TCR repertoires of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM T-cell lines (black bars) maintained in the presence of (FIG. 4A) CEA-526 peptide and (FIG. 4B) CEA-572 peptide are shown. FIG. 4 also shows Vα TCR repertoires of yeast-CEA T cell lines (white bars) maintained in the presence of (FIG. 4C) CEA-526 peptide and (FIG. 4D) CEA-572 peptide. Results are expressed as percentage of total Vα chain TCR repertoire. Astericks indicate 31 genes that are uniquely expressed in T cells from mice vaccinated with one vaccine compared to the other.

In T-cells from mice vaccinated stimulated with the CEA-526 epitope, the T-cells have shared expression of 16 of the 19 Vα genes and unique expression of 3 Vα genes (FIGS. 4A and C). In T-cells from mice vaccinated stimulated with the CEA-572 epitope, the T cells have shared expression of 15 of the 19 Vα genes and unique expression of 4 Vα genes (FIGS. 4B and D). Similar results were seen when Vβ TCR profiles were analyzed (data not shown). In addition, expression of selected Vβ TCR genes of the T-cell lines were confirmed by flow cytometry using commercially available monoclonal antibodies (data not shown). These data provide further evidence that the T-cell populations from mice vaccinated with either rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA are both vector- and antigen-specific.

To characterize the functional differences between T-cells from either vector, the CEA-specific cytolytic activity of T-cells generated from rV/FCEA/TRICOM was compared to that generated from yeast-CEA vaccination. The purity of the T-cell line cultures was confirmed via cell surface staining with monoclonal antibodies to identify CD8, CD4, and NK cells followed by flow cytometry (data not shown). In addition, tetramer staining using MHC class I-peptide tetramers specific for CEA-526 or CEA-572 confirmed peptide specificity for the T-cell lines (data not shown).

Briefly, T cell lines generated from rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccination and specific for (FIG. 5A) CEA-526 peptide and (FIG. 5C) CEA-572 peptide were incubated with peptide-pulsed ¹¹¹In-labeled EL-4 cell targets at the indicated ratios for 4 h. T-cell lines generated from yeast-CEA vaccination and specific for (FIG. 5B) CEA-526 peptide and (FIG. 5D) CEA-572 peptide were also incubated with ¹¹¹In-labeled EL-4 cell targets at the indicated ratios for 4 h. Referring to FIG. 5, EL-4 cells pulsed with CEA-572 and CEA-526 peptides are represented by solid squares connected by a solid line, and ¹¹¹In-labeled EL-4 cells pulsed with VSVNP (negative control) are represented by open circles connected by a dotted line. To determine T-cell avidity, (FIG. 5B, inset) CEA-526-specific T-cell lines from rV/F-CEA/TRICOM (closed squares) and yeast-CEA (open circles) were incubated with ¹¹¹In-labeled EL-4 cells in the presence of various concentrations of CEA-526 (or HIV-gag control) peptide ranging from 1 μM to 0 μM for 4 h. T-cell lines specific for CEA-572 epitope, generated from mice vaccinated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM (FIG. 5E) or yeast-CEA (FIG. 5F), were also used in cytolytic T-cell assays with ¹¹¹In-labeled LL2-CEA and normalized to LL2 (negative control) tumor targets at various ratios. Bars indicate standard error from triplicate wells.

FIGS. 5A and 5B show that a CEA-526 peptide-specific T-cell line generated from rV/F-CEA/TRICOM has higher lytic activity compared to a T-cell line generated from yeast-CEA vaccination. T-cell lines specific for the CEA-572 epitope both demonstrated similar levels of cytolytic activity (FIGS. 5C and 5D). FIG. 5B inset shows that the CEA-526-specific T-cell line generated from rV/F-CEA/TRICOM vaccination had a 23.3-fold higher avidity than the CEA-526-specific T-cell line generated from yeast-CEA vaccination.

The CEA-572-specific T-cell lines were also used in a CTL assay targeting ¹¹¹In-labeled LL2-CEA cells. CEA-572-specific T cells from mice vaccinated with either rV/F-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA were cultured for 20 weeks prior to this assay. Both T-cell lines lyse LL2-CEA targets and lysis decreases as the ratio of T-cells to effector cells (LL2-CEA targets) decreases (FIGS. 5E and 5F). These results indicate that both T-cell lines are capable of lysing CEA-expressing cells, although the T-cell line from mice vaccinated with yeast-CEA (FIG. 5F) had a higher level of activity compared to the T-cell line from mice vaccinated with rV/FCEA/TRICOM (FIG. 5E) when LL2-CEA cell lysis was normalized to that of LL2 cells.

To confirm that the cell lysis observed in FIGS. 5E and 5F was TCR-mediated and not due to NK cell activity, CTL experiments with blocking monoclonal antibodies specific for MHC class I molecules were performed with LL2-CEA tumor targets and normalized to LL2 target cells as a control, and showed that the presence of MHC class I blocking antibody abrogated cell lysis. The lack of NK cell-mediated lysis was further confirmed in a CTL using YAK1 targets, which found that the presence of MHC class blocking antibody abrogated YAK1 cell lysis by the various T-cell lines. Together, these results indicate that the lytic activity of T-cell lines created from different vectors targeting the same CEA-epitope is TCR-mediated and levels of cell lysis are similar when targeting peptide-pulsed target cells, although their ability to lyse CEA-expressing tumor targets differs. Additionally, the avidity of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM-induced T-cell lines may be higher than that of T-cell lines created from yeast-CEA vaccination. These results further characterize the T-cell populations from mice vaccinated with rV-CEA/TRICOM or yeast-CEA as platform-specific.

Example 6

The following example demonstrates that combining rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA is an efficacious antitumor therapy in a murine orthotopic pulmonary metastasis model.

Studies were conducted to determine if concurrent administration of the two vaccines would generate antitumor activity superior to vaccination with either vaccine platform alone. Briefly, CEA-Tg mice were injected i.v. with LL2-CEA tumor cells. On day 4, mice were primed with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM (n=10), yeast-CEA (n=14), or rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA (n=10); a control group (n=17) received no treatment. Mice were boosted every 7 days for the duration of the experiment. The rV/F-CEA/TRICOM group was boosted with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM. The yeast-CEA group was boosted with yeast-CEA only. The combination group was boosted with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA. For these studies, rV/F-CEA/TRICOM was injected s.c. on the dorsal right flank while 1 YU yeast-CEA was delivered s.c. to each inner leg and shoulder blade to target multiple draining lymph nodes. On day 45, mice were sacrificed and lungs were harvested, stained, and fixed. The data shown in FIG. 6 represent the number of lung metastases per mouse from two separate experiments (indicated by open vs. closed symbols). The bar indicates the average number of metastases per mouse p=0.015 comparing untreated mice with the rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA combination group.

Untreated mice had an average of 10.84 tumors per mouse (+2.41). Mice vaccinated with rV/FCEA/TRICOM had an average of 7.50 metastases per mouse (+2.02), and mice vaccinated with yeast-CEA had an average of 9.71 metastases per mouse (+1.22). However, mice vaccinated with the combination of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA had 2.80 metastases per mouse (+0.77); this combination group was the only group with a significantly lower number of metastases compared to the untreated control (p=0.015). Also, the maximum number of metastases per mouse for the untreated, rV/F-CEA/TRICOM, and yeast-CEA groups was 36, 24, and 18, respectively, while the maximum number of metastases in the combination group was 7. Moreover, the log-rank test (mice bearing >9 pulmonary tumor nodules on day 45; assumed to have <1 week to live) showed statistical significance between untreated mice and the mice that received the combination of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA (p=0.0027). Also, there was statistical significance between mice treated with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM alone versus concurrent vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA (p=0.0293). In addition, there was statistical significance between mice treated with yeast-CEA alone versus concurrent vaccination with rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA (p=0.0017). These results, taken together, indicate that concurrent administration of rV/F-CEA/TRICOM and yeast-CEA vaccines can increase antitumor efficacy.

As discussed above, published reports comparing vaccine platforms have historically concluded that one is more effective than the other at stimulating the immune system, and have thus recommended further development of the more effective platform for clinical studies (Riezebos-Brilman et al., Gene Ther 2007 December; 14(24):1695-704; and Casimiro et al., J Virol 2003 June; 77(11):6305-13). The results provided herein have demonstrated that the T-cell population elicited by each platform displayed unique and shared phenotypic and functional responses to different CEA epitopes. The results presented herein show for the first time that (a) 2 vaccine platforms targeting the same antigen induce distinct T-cell populations, (b) induction of these T-cell populations is both vector- and antigen-specific, and (c) the vaccines can be used concurrently in an antitumor model to improve antitumor efficacy.

While various embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. It is to be expressly understood, however, that such modifications and adaptations are within the scope of the present invention, as set forth in the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method to reduce tumor burden or inhibit tumor growth and/or to induce a therapeutic immune response against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in an individual, comprising administering two immunotherapy compositions within one dosing of the individual in order to prime the immune system with each of the compositions, the two immunotherapy compositions comprising: a) a first immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant Ad5 adenovirus comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding CEA or an immunogenic domain thereof; and b) a second immunotherapy composition comprising a whole inactivated yeast or yeast lysate that has recombinantly expressed, prior to administration, CEA or an immunogenic domain thereof; wherein the administration of the first and second immunotherapy compositions reduces tumor burden or inhibits tumor growth in the individual and/or induces a therapeutic immune response against CEA in the individual.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the whole inactivated yeast is a whole, heat-killed yeast.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the whole inactivated yeast is from Saccharomyces.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered to different sites in the individual.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second immunotherapy compositions are administered to the same site or to adjacent sites in the individual.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the CEA is human CEA.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the human CEA is full-length human CEA.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the CEA comprises a CAP1-6D epitope.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising boosting the individual with one or both of the immunotherapy compositions.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein boosting the individual is with both immunotherapy compositions.
 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising boosting the individual with a third immunotherapy composition comprising a recombinant virus comprising the virus genome or portions thereof that is different from the first immunotherapy composition.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the individual is further treated with chemotherapy and/or with radiation therapy. 